The Limit Laws

Limits respect arithmetic. If limxaf(x)\lim_{x \to a} f(x) and limxag(x)\lim_{x \to a} g(x) both exist, then sums, differences, products and quotients behave exactly as you hope:

Algebra of limits card with sum difference product quotient laws

Key Point (Theorem 1): lim[f±g]=limf±limg\lim [f \pm g] = \lim f \pm \lim g; lim[fg]=limflimg\lim [f \cdot g] = \lim f \cdot \lim g; limfg=limflimg\lim \frac{f}{g} = \frac{\lim f}{\lim g} when limg0\lim g \ne 0; and lim[λf]=λlimf\lim [\lambda f] = \lambda \lim f for a constant λ\lambda.

Polynomials: just substitute. Since limxax=a\lim_{x \to a} x = a, the product law gives limxaxn=an\lim_{x \to a} x^n = a^n, and the sum law assembles any polynomial:

limxaf(x)=f(a)for every polynomial f\lim_{x \to a} f(x) = f(a) \quad \text{for every polynomial } f

Rational functions g(x)h(x)\frac{g(x)}{h(x)}: substitute first. If h(a)0h(a) \ne 0 the answer is g(a)h(a)\frac{g(a)}{h(a)}. If h(a)=0h(a) = 0 but g(a)0g(a) \ne 0, the limit does not exist. If both vanish — the 00\frac{0}{0} form — factor the vanishing power of (xa)(x - a) out of top and bottom and cancel:

Step by step playbook for zero by zero rational limits

Cancelling (xa)(x - a) is legal precisely because xax \to a means xax \ne a throughout the approach.

The Workhorse: limxaxnanxa=nan1\lim_{x \to a} \frac{x^n - a^n}{x - a} = na^{n-1}

Key Point (Theorem 2): for any positive integer nn — and in fact any rational nn (with a>0a > 0 where needed) —

limxaxnanxa=nan1\lim_{x \to a} \frac{x^n - a^n}{x - a} = na^{n-1}

Workhorse limit x to n minus a to n over x minus a

Why: xnan=(xa)(xn1+xn2a++an1)x^n - a^n = (x - a)(x^{n-1} + x^{n-2}a + \cdots + a^{n-1}); after cancelling, each of the nn surviving terms tends to an1a^{n-1}.

Using it: limx1x151x101\lim_{x \to 1} \frac{x^{15} - 1}{x^{10} - 1} — divide top and bottom by x1x - 1 and apply the theorem twice: 1510=32\frac{15}{10} = \frac{3}{2}. And limx01+x1x\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sqrt{1 + x} - 1}{x}: substitute y=1+xy = 1 + x to get limy1y1/21y1=12\lim_{y \to 1} \frac{y^{1/2} - 1}{y - 1} = \frac{1}{2} — the rational-exponent case at work.

Recognition drill: any limit of the shape (power)(same power at a)xa\frac{(\text{power}) - (\text{same power at } a)}{x - a} is this theorem; so is (x+1)51x\frac{(x+1)^5 - 1}{x} after the shift y=x+1y = x + 1.

[Board Tip] Quote the theorem by name-and-statement when you use it — "by limxaxnanxa=nan1\lim_{x \to a}\frac{x^n - a^n}{x - a} = na^{n-1}" — the step earns its mark only when the examiner can see which tool you applied.

Solved Examples

Example 1: Polynomials by substitution

Find: (i) limx1[x3x2+1]\lim_{x \to 1}[x^3 - x^2 + 1]; (ii) limx3[x(x+1)]\lim_{x \to 3}[x(x + 1)]; (iii) limx1[1+x+x2++x10]\lim_{x \to -1}[1 + x + x^2 + \cdots + x^{10}].

Solution:

Step 1 — (i) Substitute. Polynomials obey lim=\lim = value: 11+1=11 - 1 + 1 = 1.

Step 2 — (ii). 3×(3+1)=123 \times (3 + 1) = 12.

Step 3 — (iii) Count the alternation. At x=1x = -1 the eleven terms run 11+1+11 - 1 + 1 - \cdots + 1: five cancelling pairs plus a final +1+1 — the limit is 1.

Takeaway: For any polynomial, the limit is one substitution; the only care needed is arithmetic, as in the alternating sum.

Example 2: Direct substitution

Evaluate: (i) limx3(x+3)\lim_{x \to 3}(x + 3); (ii) limxπ(x227)\lim_{x \to \pi}\left(x - \frac{22}{7}\right); (iii) limr1πr2\lim_{r \to 1} \pi r^2.

Solution:

Step 1 — (i). 3+3=63 + 3 = 6.

Step 2 — (ii). π227\pi - \frac{22}{7} — and this is NOT zero: 227=3.142857\frac{22}{7} = 3.142857\ldots is only an approximation of π=3.14159\pi = 3.14159\ldots; the limit is a small negative number.

Step 3 — (iii). π(1)2=π\pi(1)^2 = \pi.

Takeaway: Part (ii) is a designed trap — π227\pi \ne \frac{22}{7}; leave the answer symbolic.

Example 3: Rational, denominator alive

Evaluate: (i) limx44x+3x2\lim_{x \to 4} \frac{4x + 3}{x - 2}; (ii) limx1x10+x5+1x1\lim_{x \to -1} \frac{x^{10} + x^5 + 1}{x - 1}.

Solution:

Step 1 — Check the denominator FIRST. (i) At 4: x2=20x - 2 = 2 \ne 0 — safe to substitute.

Step 2 — (i) Substitute. 16+32=192\frac{16 + 3}{2} = \frac{19}{2}.

Step 3 — (ii) Same check, then substitute. Denominator 20-2 \ne 0: 11+12=12\frac{1 - 1 + 1}{-2} = -\frac{1}{2}.

Takeaway: A rational limit begins with one question — is the denominator non-zero at the point? If yes, it is a substitution problem.

Example 4: The 0/0 factor-cancel

Evaluate: (i) limx2x34x2+4xx24\lim_{x \to 2} \frac{x^3 - 4x^2 + 4x}{x^2 - 4}; (ii) limx2x24x34x2+4x\lim_{x \to 2} \frac{x^2 - 4}{x^3 - 4x^2 + 4x}; (iii) limx2x32x2x25x+6\lim_{x \to 2} \frac{x^3 - 2x^2}{x^2 - 5x + 6}.

Solution:

Step 1 — (i) Factor out the vanishing power. x(x2)2(x+2)(x2)=x(x2)x+2\frac{x(x-2)^2}{(x+2)(x-2)} = \frac{x(x-2)}{x+2}; substituting, 2×04=0\frac{2 \times 0}{4} = 0.

Step 2 — (ii) The reciprocal flips the story. (x+2)(x2)x(x2)2=x+2x(x2)40\frac{(x+2)(x-2)}{x(x-2)^2} = \frac{x+2}{x(x-2)} \to \frac{4}{0}: numerator alive, denominator dead — the limit does not exist.

Step 3 — (iii) Factor and cancel once. x2(x2)(x2)(x3)=x2x341=4\frac{x^2(x-2)}{(x-2)(x-3)} = \frac{x^2}{x-3} \to \frac{4}{-1} = -4.

Step by step playbook for zero by zero rational limits

Takeaway: After cancelling, re-substitute and READ the form: 04\frac{0}{4} is 0, 40\frac{4}{0} is no limit, 41\frac{4}{-1} is just arithmetic.

Example 5: Combine first, then cancel

Evaluate limx1[x2x2x1x33x2+2x]\lim_{x \to 1}\left[\frac{x - 2}{x^2 - x} - \frac{1}{x^3 - 3x^2 + 2x}\right].

Solution:

Step 1 — Factor the denominators. x2x=x(x1)x^2 - x = x(x-1); x33x2+2x=x(x1)(x2)x^3 - 3x^2 + 2x = x(x-1)(x-2).

Step 2 — Combine over the common denominator x(x1)(x2)x(x-1)(x-2). Numerator: (x2)21=x24x+3=(x3)(x1)(x-2)^2 - 1 = x^2 - 4x + 3 = (x-3)(x-1).

Step 3 — Cancel and substitute. (x3)(x1)x(x1)(x2)=x3x(x2)21×(1)=2\frac{(x-3)(x-1)}{x(x-1)(x-2)} = \frac{x-3}{x(x-2)} \to \frac{-2}{1 \times (-1)} = 2.

Takeaway: When each piece separately blows up, combine into ONE fraction first — the infinities cancel on paper before they can mislead.

Example 6: Shifted powers and quadratics

Evaluate: (i) limx0(x+1)51x\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{(x+1)^5 - 1}{x}; (ii) limx23x2x10x24\lim_{x \to 2} \frac{3x^2 - x - 10}{x^2 - 4}.

Solution:

Step 1 — (i) Shift into workhorse form. Put y=x+1y = x + 1 (so y1y \to 1): limy1y51y1\lim_{y \to 1} \frac{y^5 - 1}{y - 1}.

Step 2 — (i) Apply the theorem. 5(1)4=55(1)^4 = 5.

Step 3 — (ii) Factor the 0/0. (x2)(3x+5)(x2)(x+2)=3x+5x+2114\frac{(x-2)(3x+5)}{(x-2)(x+2)} = \frac{3x+5}{x+2} \to \frac{11}{4}.

Takeaway: (x+1)n1(x + 1)^n - 1 over xx is the workhorse in disguise — one substitution reveals it.

Example 7: Higher-degree factoring

Evaluate limx3x4812x25x3\lim_{x \to 3} \frac{x^4 - 81}{2x^2 - 5x - 3}.

Solution:

Step 1 — Factor top and bottom. x481=(x29)(x2+9)=(x3)(x+3)(x2+9)x^4 - 81 = (x^2 - 9)(x^2 + 9) = (x-3)(x+3)(x^2+9); 2x25x3=(x3)(2x+1)2x^2 - 5x - 3 = (x-3)(2x+1).

Step 2 — Cancel (x3)(x - 3). Left with (x+3)(x2+9)2x+1\frac{(x+3)(x^2+9)}{2x+1}.

Step 3 — Substitute. 6×187=1087\frac{6 \times 18}{7} = \frac{108}{7}.

Takeaway: Difference of squares twice (x481x29x3x^4 - 81 \to x^2 - 9 \to x - 3) — factor DOWN to the vanishing linear factor, no further.

Example 8: Parameters ride along

Evaluate: (i) limx0ax+bcx+1\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{ax + b}{cx + 1}; (ii) limx1ax2+bx+ccx2+bx+a\lim_{x \to 1} \frac{ax^2 + bx + c}{cx^2 + bx + a} given a+b+c0a + b + c \ne 0.

Solution:

Step 1 — (i) Denominator at 0. c(0)+1=10c(0) + 1 = 1 \ne 0: substitute.

Step 2 — (i) Read off. b1=b\frac{b}{1} = b.

Step 3 — (ii) Substitute at 1. Top: a+b+ca + b + c; bottom: c+b+ac + b + a — identical sums. The limit is 1, and the hypothesis a+b+c0a + b + c \ne 0 is exactly what keeps 00\frac{0}{0} away.

Takeaway: Letters obey the same laws as numbers — check the denominator, substitute, simplify.

Example 9: Fractional powers via substitution

Evaluate limz1z1/31z1/61\lim_{z \to 1} \frac{z^{1/3} - 1}{z^{1/6} - 1}.

Solution:

Step 1 — Clear the fractions with one substitution. Let z=t6z = t^6 (as z1z \to 1, t1t \to 1): z1/3=t2z^{1/3} = t^2 and z1/6=tz^{1/6} = t.

Step 2 — Simplify. t21t1=t+1\frac{t^2 - 1}{t - 1} = t + 1 for t1t \ne 1.

Step 3 — Conclude. The limit is 1+1=21 + 1 = 2. (Or apply the workhorse twice: 1/31/6=2\frac{1/3}{1/6} = 2 ✓.)

Takeaway: For mixed fractional exponents substitute z=tkz = t^k with kk the LCM of the denominators — every power turns into an integer power.

Example 10: Combine, then cancel

Evaluate limx21x+12x+2\lim_{x \to -2} \frac{\frac{1}{x} + \frac{1}{2}}{x + 2}.

Solution:

Step 1 — Combine the numerator. 1x+12=2+x2x\frac{1}{x} + \frac{1}{2} = \frac{2 + x}{2x}.

Step 2 — Divide. x+22x(x+2)=12x\frac{x + 2}{2x(x + 2)} = \frac{1}{2x} for x2x \ne -2.

Step 3 — Substitute. 12(2)=14\frac{1}{2(-2)} = -\frac{1}{4}.

Takeaway: The (x+2)(x + 2) upstairs was hiding inside the little fractions — simplify complex fractions before touching the limit.

Example 11: The workhorse twice

Evaluate: (i) limx1x151x101\lim_{x \to 1} \frac{x^{15} - 1}{x^{10} - 1}; (ii) limx01+x1x\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sqrt{1+x} - 1}{x}.

Solution:

Step 1 — (i) Divide top and bottom by x1x - 1. (x151)/(x1)(x101)/(x1)15(1)1410(1)9\frac{(x^{15}-1)/(x-1)}{(x^{10}-1)/(x-1)} \to \frac{15(1)^{14}}{10(1)^9}.

Step 2 — (i) Simplify. 1510=32\frac{15}{10} = \frac{3}{2}.

Step 3 — (ii) Shift to base 1. With y=1+xy = 1 + x: limy1y1/21y1=12(1)1/2=12\lim_{y \to 1} \frac{y^{1/2} - 1}{y - 1} = \frac{1}{2}(1)^{-1/2} = \frac{1}{2}.

Workhorse limit x to n minus a to n over x minus a

Takeaway: Splitting one ratio into two workhorse quotients (divide both by xax - a) is the standard trick for xmamxnan\frac{x^m - a^m}{x^n - a^n}: answer mnamn\frac{m}{n}a^{m-n}.

Example 12: Workhorse with a general exponent

If limx2xn2nx2=80\lim_{x \to 2} \frac{x^n - 2^n}{x - 2} = 80 for a positive integer nn, find nn.

Solution:

Step 1 — Apply the theorem. The limit equals n2n1n \cdot 2^{n-1}.

Step 2 — Solve n2n1=80n \cdot 2^{n-1} = 80. Test small nn: n=4n = 4: 4×8=324 \times 8 = 32; n=5n = 5: 5×16=805 \times 16 = 80 ✓.

Step 3 — Conclude. n=5n = 5 (and the function n2n1n \cdot 2^{n-1} is increasing, so the solution is unique).

Takeaway: Parameter versions of the workhorse reduce to small integer equations — test values rather than solving formally.