How to Use This Section

Here are 32 fully worked problems covering the entire chapter — representations, types of sets, subsets and intervals, and the four operations with De Morgan's laws — arranged in a deliberate easy → medium → hard progression.

A suggestion that multiplies the value of every problem: attempt each one yourself before reading the solution. Cover the solution, write your answer, then compare. The gap between "I follow the solution" and "I produced the solution" is exactly the gap between reading marks and scoring marks.

Problems 1-10 warm you up on representations and classification, 11-22 build fluency with subsets, intervals and operations, and 23-32 finish with proof-style and multi-step questions of Board and JEE difficulty.

Solved Examples

Example 1. Which of these are sets? (i) The collection of all even integers. (ii) A collection of the most dangerous animals of the world. (iii) The collection of all questions in this chapter.

Solution.

Step 1 — apply the well-defined test to each collection. A collection is a set exactly when membership can be decided objectively.

(i) Step 2. Given any object, we can check definitively whether it is an even integer (integer? divisible by 2?). Set.

(ii) Step 3. "Most dangerous" is a matter of opinion — one person's list differs from another's, and no objective rule decides membership. Not a set.

(iii) Step 4. The questions printed in this chapter form a definite, checkable list. Set.

Takeaway: objective criterion → set; subjective superlative → not a set.


Example 2. Write in roster form: (i) A={x:x is an integer and 3x<7}A = \{x : x \text{ is an integer and } -3 \leq x < 7\} (ii) B={x:x is a natural number less than 6}B = \{x : x \text{ is a natural number less than 6}\}.

Solution.

(i) Step 1 — read the brackets on the bounds. 3x-3 \leq x includes 3-3; x<7x < 7 excludes 7.

Step 2 — list the integers. A = {3-3, 2-2, 1-1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}. Count check: from 3-3 to 6 inclusive is 6(3)+1=106 - (-3) + 1 = 10 elements ✓.

(ii) Step 3. Naturals strictly below 6: B = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}.

Takeaway: \leq admits the endpoint, << excludes it — settle each bound before listing.


Example 3. Write in roster form: C={x:x is a two-digit natural number such that the sum of its digits is 8}C = \{x : x \text{ is a two-digit natural number such that the sum of its digits is 8}\}.

Solution.

Step 1 — set up a systematic scan. Write x=10t+ux = 10t + u with tens digit t1t \geq 1 and units digit uu, demanding t+u=8t + u = 8.

Step 2 — run t from 1 upwards. t=1,u=717t = 1, u = 7 \to 17; t=2,u=626t = 2, u = 6 \to 26; t=335t = 3 \to 35; t=444t = 4 \to 44; t=553t = 5 \to 53; t=662t = 6 \to 62; t=771t = 7 \to 71; t=8,u=080t = 8, u = 0 \to 80. (t=9t = 9 would need u=1u = -1 — stop.)

Step 3 — write the set. C = {17, 26, 35, 44, 53, 62, 71, 80}, eight elements.

Takeaway: scanning by the tens digit in increasing order guarantees nothing is missed and nothing is repeated — note 80 counts but "08" does not (not a two-digit number).

Example 4. Write in set-builder form: (i) {3, 6, 9, 12} (ii) {5, 25, 125, 625} (iii) {2, 4, 6, …}.

Solution.

(i) Step 1. Each element is 3 times its position: 3,6,9,12=3×1,,3×43, 6, 9, 12 = 3 \times 1, \ldots, 3 \times 4. The list stops, so bound the parameter: {x:x=3n,nN and 1n4}\{x : x = 3n, n \in \mathbb{N} \text{ and } 1 \leq n \leq 4\}.

(ii) Step 2. Rewrite as powers: 5=51,25=52,125=53,625=545 = 5^1, 25 = 5^2, 125 = 5^3, 625 = 5^4: {x:x=5n,nN and 1n4}\{x : x = 5^n, n \in \mathbb{N} \text{ and } 1 \leq n \leq 4\}.

(iii) Step 3. The dots signal an unending pattern — all even naturals: {x:x=2n,nN}\{x : x = 2n, n \in \mathbb{N}\}, with NO bound on nn.

Takeaway: finite list → bounded parameter; trailing dots → free parameter. The bound is part of the answer, not decoration.


Example 5. Decide whether each set is empty: (i) {x:xN,x<5 and x>7}\{x : x \in \mathbb{N}, x < 5 \text{ and } x > 7\} (ii) {y:y is a point common to two parallel lines}\{y : y \text{ is a point common to two parallel lines}\} (iii) {x:xN,x2<25 and x is even}\{x : x \in \mathbb{N}, x^2 < 25 \text{ and } x \text{ is even}\}.

Solution.

(i) Step 1. The demands x<5x < 5 and x>7x > 7 describe disjoint stretches of the number line — no number satisfies both. ϕ\phi.

(ii) Step 2. Parallel lines never meet, so no common point exists. ϕ\phi.

(iii) Step 3 — check honestly before declaring emptiness. Naturals with x2<25x^2 < 25: 1, 2, 3, 4. Keep the even ones: 2 and 4. The set is {2, 4} — not empty.

Takeaway: two conditions joined by "and" are not automatically contradictory — always run the filter before answering ϕ\phi.


Example 6. Classify: (i) the set of concentric circles centred at the origin (ii) the set of letters of the word INFINITE (iii) {xZ:x2100}\{x \in \mathbb{Z} : x^2 \leq 100\}.

Solution.

(i) Step 1. One circle for every positive radius rr, and the positive reals are unending. Infinite.

(ii) Step 2. INFINITE = I, N, F, I, N, I, T, E; distinct letters {I, N, F, T, E}. Finite, n=5n = 5.

(iii) Step 3. x2100x^2 \leq 100 means 10x10-10 \leq x \leq 10: the integers 10,9,,10-10, -9, \ldots, 10. Count: 10(10)+1=2110 - (-10) + 1 = 21. Finite, n=21n = 21.

Takeaway: the word INFINITE names a finite set — judge by elements, never by names; and in symmetric integer ranges, remember to count 0.

Example 7. Are A and B equal? A={2,3}A = \{2, 3\}, B={x:x is a solution of x2+5x+6=0}B = \{x : x \text{ is a solution of } x^2 + 5x + 6 = 0\}.

Solution.

Step 1 — solve for B. Factorise: two numbers with product +6+6 and sum +5+5 are +2,+3+2, +3, so x2+5x+6=(x+2)(x+3)=0x^2 + 5x + 6 = (x + 2)(x + 3) = 0, giving x=2x = -2 or x=3x = -3.

Step 2 — write B and compare. B = {2-2, 3-3}, while A = {2, 3}. The elements differ in sign: 2A2 \in A but 2B2 \notin B.

Step 3 — conclude. ABA \neq B. Sanity check: with all coefficients positive, x2+5x+6x^2 + 5x + 6 is positive for every positive xx — no positive root was ever possible.

Takeaway: factorising x2+5x+6x^2 + 5x + 6 gives roots 2,3-2, -3, NOT 2,32, 3 — the sign slip here is epidemic in exams.


Example 8. A = the set of letters of REAP, B = of PEAR, C = of PAPER. Which pairs are equal?

Solution.

Step 1 — convert each word to its letter set. REAP → {R, E, A, P}. PEAR → {P, E, A, R}. PAPER → P, A, P, E, R → drop the repeated P → {P, A, E, R}.

Step 2 — compare. All three sets contain exactly the four letters A, E, P, R.

Step 3 — conclude. A = B = C — every pair is equal.

Takeaway: anagrams share a letter set automatically, and even a longer word with repeats (PAPER) can collapse to the same set.


Example 9. Let A = {1, {2}, 3}. True or false: (i) 1A1 \in A (ii) 2A2 \in A (iii) {2}A\{2\} \in A (iv) {2}A\{2\} \subset A (v) {1,3}A\{1, 3\} \subset A.

Solution.

Step 1 — inventory A. Three elements: the number 1, the packet {2}, the number 3. The bare number 2 is NOT an element.

(i) Step 2. 1 is listed → true.

(ii) Step 3. Scan the list: 1, {2}, 3 — the number 2 is absent → false.

(iii) Step 4. The packet {2} IS listed → true.

(iv) Step 5. {2}A\{2\} \subset A would require the ELEMENT 2 to belong to A, which (ii) denied → false.

(v) Step 6. Unpack {1, 3}: both 1 and 3 are elements of A → true.

Takeaway: {2} can be an element without 2 being one — unpack braces with total literal-mindedness.

Example 10. How many subsets does A = {p, q, r, s} have? How many are proper? How many contain the element p?

Solution.

Step 1 — all subsets. Each of the 4 elements is independently IN or OUT: 24=162^4 = 16 subsets.

Step 2 — proper subsets. Proper excludes the set itself (only): 161=1516 - 1 = 15.

Step 3 — subsets containing p. Fix p IN; the remaining elements q, r, s still choose freely: 23=82^3 = 8 subsets.

Takeaway: "fix and count the free choices" answers every constrained subset count in one line — fixing kk elements leaves 2nk2^{n-k} subsets.


Example 11. Let A = [2,5][2, 5], B = (1,6)(1, 6), C = (2,5)(2, 5). Determine all subset relations among A, B, C.

Solution.

Step 1 — test CAC \subset A. Take xx with 2<x<52 < x < 5; then certainly 2x52 \leq x \leq 5. ✓ And the inclusion is proper: 2A2 \in A but 2C2 \notin C.

Step 2 — test ABA \subset B. Take xx with 2x52 \leq x \leq 5; since 1<21 < 2 and 5<65 < 6, we get 1<x<61 < x < 6. ✓ (The closed interval fits inside the strictly larger open one.)

Step 3 — chain them. CABC \subset A \subset B, and transitivity gives CBC \subset B as well. No reverse inclusion holds (e.g. 1.5B1.5 \in B lies in neither A nor C).

Takeaway: endpoint inclusion matters only when endpoints coincide; when one interval strictly contains the other's endpoints, brackets are irrelevant.


Example 12. Write as intervals and state their lengths: (i) {xR:12<x10}\{x \in \mathbb{R} : -12 < x \leq -10\} (ii) {xR:x3}\{x \in \mathbb{R} : x \geq 3\} (iii) {xR:x29}\{x \in \mathbb{R} : x^2 \leq 9\}.

Solution.

(i) Step 1. Strict left, inclusive right: (12,10](-12, -10]. Length =10(12)=2= -10 - (-12) = 2.

(ii) Step 2. From 3 (included) without upper bound: [3,)[3, \infty) — an unbounded interval, no finite length.

(iii) Step 3 — unfold the squared inequality. x29    x3    3x3x^2 \leq 9 \iff |x| \leq 3 \iff -3 \leq x \leq 3: the interval [3,3][-3, 3], length 3(3)=63 - (-3) = 6.

Takeaway: the key conversion is (iii): x2a2    axax^2 \leq a^2 \iff -a \leq x \leq a — a squared bound unfolds into a symmetric closed interval.

Example 13. Find ABA \cup B where A = {x:x is a natural number and multiple of 3}\{x : x \text{ is a natural number and multiple of 3}\} and B = {x:x is a natural number less than 6}\{x : x \text{ is a natural number less than 6}\}.

Solution.

Step 1 — roster both sets. A = {3, 6, 9, 12, …} (infinite), B = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}.

Step 2 — merge. ABA \cup B = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12, 15, …} — B's small numbers plus every multiple of 3.

Step 3 — express cleanly. For an infinite union, set-builder with "or" is the polished answer: AB={x:xN,x<6 or x is a multiple of 3}A \cup B = \{x : x \in \mathbb{N}, x < 6 \text{ or } x \text{ is a multiple of 3}\}.

Takeaway: union translates to "or"; infinite unions are best LEFT in set-builder form rather than dotted rosters.


Example 14. A = {x:xN,1<x6}\{x : x \in \mathbb{N}, 1 < x \leq 6\}, B = {x:xN,6<x<10}\{x : x \in \mathbb{N}, 6 < x < 10\}. Find ABA \cup B and ABA \cap B.

Solution.

Step 1 — roster the sets, minding the strict/inclusive bounds. A: naturals with 1<x61 < x \leq 6 → {2, 3, 4, 5, 6}. B: naturals with 6<x<106 < x < 10 → {7, 8, 9}.

Step 2 — union. ABA \cup B = {2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9}.

Step 3 — intersection: check the boundary. 6 belongs to A (its \leq) but not to B (its strict >>); 7 belongs to B only. No element is shared: AB=ϕA \cap B = \phi — the sets are disjoint.

Takeaway: adjacent ranges can touch without overlapping; the verdict lives entirely at the boundary values.


Example 15. If A = {1, 2, 3}, B = ϕ\phi, find ABA \cup B, ABA \cap B, ABA - B and BAB - A.

Solution.

Step 1. ABA \cup B: the empty set contributes nothing → AB=A={1,2,3}A \cup B = A = \{1, 2, 3\} (identity law).

Step 2. ABA \cap B: a common element would have to lie in ϕ\phi — impossible → ϕ\phi.

Step 3. ABA - B: strike from A everything in ϕ\phi — nothing gets struck → A = {1, 2, 3}.

Step 4. BAB - A: the empty set has nothing to keep → ϕ\phi.

Takeaway: ϕ\phi is completely predictable: union leaves the other set alone; intersection and both differences involving ϕ\phi on the left collapse to ϕ\phi.

Example 16. A = {3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21}, B = {4, 8, 12, 16, 20}, C = {2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16}, D = {5, 10, 15, 20}. Find (i) A − D (ii) D − A (iii) B − D (iv) C − D (v) D − C.

Venn diagram of A minus B, the intersection, and B minus A

Solution.

Step 1 — find each relevant overlap first. AD={15}A \cap D = \{15\}; BD={20}B \cap D = \{20\}; CD={10}C \cap D = \{10\}.

(i) Step 2. Strike 15 from A: AD={3,6,9,12,18,21}A - D = \{3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 21\}.

(ii) Step 3. Strike 15 from D: DA={5,10,20}D - A = \{5, 10, 20\}.

(iii) Step 4. Strike 20 from B: BD={4,8,12,16}B - D = \{4, 8, 12, 16\}.

(iv) Step 5. Strike 10 from C: CD={2,4,6,8,12,14,16}C - D = \{2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 14, 16\}.

(v) Step 6. Strike 10 from D: DC={5,15,20}D - C = \{5, 15, 20\}.

Takeaway: compute the intersection once, then strike it from the left-hand set — two clean steps per part, no rescanning, and the shared element never survives on either side.


Example 17. Show that ABA \subset B if and only if AB=ϕA - B = \phi.

Solution.

Step 1 — forward direction (\Rightarrow). Assume ABA \subset B. An element of ABA - B would lie in A but not in B — yet every element of A IS in B. No such element exists: AB=ϕA - B = \phi.

Step 2 — reverse direction (\Leftarrow). Assume AB=ϕA - B = \phi. Take any aAa \in A. If aBa \notin B, then aa would belong to ABA - B, contradicting its emptiness. Hence aBa \in B.

Step 3 — conclude. Every element of A lies in B, i.e. ABA \subset B. Both directions proved. ∎

Takeaway: this equivalence converts subset claims into difference computations and back — one of the four equivalent faces of ABA \subset B (see Example 28).


Example 18. If U = {a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h}, find the complements of A = {a, b, c}, B = {d, e, f, g} and D = {f, g, h, a}.

Solution.

Step 1 — method. Each complement is U minus the set: strike the set's elements from U's list.

Step 2. A': strike a, b, c → {d,e,f,g,h}\{d, e, f, g, h\}.

Step 3. B': strike d, e, f, g → {a,b,c,h}\{a, b, c, h\}.

Step 4. D': strike f, g, h, a → {b,c,d,e}\{b, c, d, e\}.

Step 5 — verify with the counting check. n(A)+n(A)=3+5=8=n(U)n(A) + n(A') = 3 + 5 = 8 = n(U) ✓; 4+4=84 + 4 = 8 ✓; 4+4=84 + 4 = 8 ✓.

Takeaway: n(A)+n(A)=n(U)n(A) + n(A') = n(U) every time — an instant arithmetic check on any complement.

Example 19. U = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9}, A = {2, 4, 6, 8}, B = {2, 3, 5, 7}. Verify (i) (AB)=AB(A \cup B)' = A' \cap B' (ii) (AB)=AB(A \cap B)' = A' \cup B'.

Shaded complement of A in universal rectangle with property list

Solution.

Step 1 — compute the two complements once, for reuse. A' = U − A = {1, 3, 5, 7, 9}; B' = U − B = {1, 4, 6, 8, 9}.

(i) Step 2 — left side. AB={2,3,4,5,6,7,8}A \cup B = \{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8\}, so (AB)={1,9}(A \cup B)' = \{1, 9\}.

Step 3 — right side. ABA' \cap B': common to {1, 3, 5, 7, 9} and {1, 4, 6, 8, 9} → {1, 9}. Match ✓.

(ii) Step 4 — left side. AB={2}A \cap B = \{2\} (the only shared element), so (AB)={1,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}(A \cap B)' = \{1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9\}.

Step 5 — right side. AB={1,3,5,7,9}{1,4,6,8,9}={1,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}A' \cup B' = \{1, 3, 5, 7, 9\} \cup \{1, 4, 6, 8, 9\} = \{1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9\}. Match ✓.

Takeaway: both De Morgan laws verified on one dataset — compute each side independently and match; this exact verification is a recurring 3-mark question.


Example 20. With U = N\mathbb{N}, describe the complements of: (i) the multiples of 3 (ii) {x:x7}\{x : x \geq 7\} (iii) the perfect cubes.

Solution.

Step 1 — method for an infinite universe. Listing is impossible; NEGATE the defining condition instead.

(i) Step 2. Negate "multiple of 3": {xN:x is not a multiple of 3}\{x \in \mathbb{N} : x \text{ is not a multiple of 3}\} = {1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, …}.

(ii) Step 3. Negate x7x \geq 7: x<7x < 7, giving {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} — here the complement happens to be finite and listable.

(iii) Step 4. Negate "perfect cube": {xN:x is not a perfect cube}\{x \in \mathbb{N} : x \text{ is not a perfect cube}\} — every natural except 1, 8, 27, 64, …

Takeaway: complementing negates the condition — \geq flips to <<, "is" flips to "is not"; solve any inequality before negating.


Example 21. Fill in: (i) AA=A \cup A' = \ldots (ii) ϕA=\phi\,' \cap A = \ldots (iii) AA=A \cap A' = \ldots (iv) UA=U' \cap A = \ldots

Solution.

Step 1 — reduce the primed extreme sets first. ϕ=U\phi\,' = U and U=ϕU' = \phi — memorise these two reductions.

(i) Step 2. Complement law: AA=UA \cup A' = U (everything is in A or outside it).

(ii) Step 3. ϕA=UA=A\phi\,' \cap A = U \cap A = A (law of U).

(iii) Step 4. Complement law: AA=ϕA \cap A' = \phi (nothing is both in and out).

(iv) Step 5. UA=ϕA=ϕU' \cap A = \phi \cap A = \phi (law of ϕ\phi).

Takeaway: two reductions plus two laws answer all four blanks — reduce first, then apply.

Example 22. Let A = [1,5)[1, 5) and B = (3,8](3, 8] as subsets of R\mathbb{R}. Find ABA \cup B, ABA \cap B and A − B.

Number lines showing open closed and semi open intervals with dots

Solution.

Step 1 — sketch the number line. A runs from 1 (filled dot, in) to 5 (hollow, out); B from 3 (hollow, out) to 8 (filled, in). They overlap between 3 and 5.

Step 2 — union. Coverage starts at 1 (in, from A) and ends at 8 (in, from B) with no gap between: AB=[1,8]A \cup B = [1, 8].

Step 3 — intersection. Both conditions at once: 1x<51 \leq x < 5 AND 3<x83 < x \leq 8 reduce to 3<x<53 < x < 5. Boundary check: 3 fails B's strict >>; 5 fails A's strict <<. So AB=(3,5)A \cap B = (3, 5).

Step 4 — difference. ABA - B: the part of A NOT in B, i.e. 1x<51 \leq x < 5 with x3x \leq 3. Boundary check on 3: 3B3 \notin B, so 3 SURVIVES the strike-out: AB=[1,3]A - B = [1, 3].

Takeaway: do interval operations on a sketch, then interrogate each of the four boundary points separately — "is this endpoint in or out?" decides every bracket.


Example 23. Using properties of sets, show that (i) A(AB)=AA \cup (A \cap B) = A (ii) A(AB)=AA \cap (A \cup B) = A.

Solution.

(i) Step 1. ABAA \cap B \subset A — the overlap is part of A. Step 2. Union of A with one of its own subsets adds nothing: A(AB)=AA \cup (A \cap B) = A.

(ii) Step 3. AABA \subset A \cup B — the union is a superset of A. Step 4. Intersecting A with one of its supersets keeps all of A: A(AB)=AA \cap (A \cup B) = A.

Takeaway: the absorption laws — union with a subset, intersection with a superset, both leave A untouched. They simplify monstrous expressions in one stroke.


Example 24. Show that AB=ACA \cap B = A \cap C need NOT imply B = C.

Solution.

Step 1 — plan the counterexample. We need B and C that agree INSIDE A but differ outside it — the intersection only sees the inside.

Step 2 — construct. A = {1, 2}, B = {2, 3}, C = {2, 4}.

Step 3 — verify. AB={2}A \cap B = \{2\} and AC={2}A \cap C = \{2\} — equal ✓. But 3B3 \in B while 3C3 \notin C, so BCB \neq C ✓.

Takeaway: intersection has no cancellation law — it is blind to everything outside A. (Remarkably, if BOTH AB=ACA \cap B = A \cap C AND AB=ACA \cup B = A \cup C hold, then B = C — Example 27.)

Example 25. Show that if ABA \subset B, then CBCAC - B \subset C - A.

Solution.

Step 1 — take a generic element. Let xCBx \in C - B: then xCx \in C and xBx \notin B.

Step 2 — push non-membership backwards. Could xx be in A? If it were, ABA \subset B would force xBx \in B — contradicting xBx \notin B. Hence xAx \notin A.

Step 3 — land the element. xCx \in C and xAx \notin A mean exactly xCAx \in C - A.

Step 4 — conclude. Every element of CBC - B lies in CAC - A: CBCAC - B \subset C - A. ∎

Takeaway: subtracting a BIGGER set leaves LESS — the inclusion reverses direction, exactly like taking reciprocals of positive numbers.


Example 26. Show that A(BA)=ABA \cup (B - A) = A \cup B.

Solution.

Step 1 — left inside right. AABA \subset A \cup B ✓ and BABABB - A \subset B \subset A \cup B ✓, so A(BA)ABA \cup (B - A) \subset A \cup B.

Step 2 — right inside left. Take xABx \in A \cup B. Case 1: xAx \in A — then x is in the left side directly. Case 2: xAx \notin A — then x must come from B, so xBx \in B and xAx \notin A, i.e. xBAx \in B - A — again in the left side.

Step 3 — conclude. Both containments hold: A(BA)=ABA \cup (B - A) = A \cup B. ∎

Takeaway: BAB - A is exactly the "new material" B contributes to the union — draw the Venn picture once and this identity becomes obvious forever.


Example 27. Let A, B, C satisfy AB=ACA \cup B = A \cup C and AB=ACA \cap B = A \cap C. Show that B = C.

Solution.

Step 1 — start from B and absorb. B=B(AB)B = B \cap (A \cup B) by the absorption law.

Step 2 — substitute the first hypothesis. AB=ACA \cup B = A \cup C, so B=B(AC)B = B \cap (A \cup C). Distribute: B=(BA)(BC)B = (B \cap A) \cup (B \cap C).

Step 3 — substitute the second hypothesis. BA=AB=ACB \cap A = A \cap B = A \cap C, so B=(AC)(BC)B = (A \cap C) \cup (B \cap C). Factor C out by distributivity: B=(AB)CB = (A \cup B) \cap C.

Step 4 — finish with absorption. Using the first hypothesis once more: B=(AC)C=CB = (A \cup C) \cap C = C (absorption). Hence B = C. ∎

Takeaway: neither hypothesis cancels A alone (Example 24 killed one; a similar example kills the other), but TOGETHER they pin B to C — the chapter's most elegant proof; walk through it twice.

Example 28. Show that the following are equivalent: (i) ABA \subset B (ii) AB=ϕA - B = \phi (iii) AB=BA \cup B = B (iv) AB=AA \cap B = A.

Solution.

Step 1 — plan a cycle. Proving (i) → (ii) → (iii) → (iv) → (i) makes all four equivalent with only four implications.

Step 2 — (i) → (ii). If every element of A lies in B, no element qualifies for ABA - B: it is ϕ\phi.

Step 3 — (ii) → (iii). AB=ϕA - B = \phi means A has nothing outside B, so pooling A into B adds nothing: AB=BA \cup B = B.

Step 4 — (iii) → (iv). AB=A(AB)=AA \cap B = A \cap (A \cup B) = A by the absorption law (using B=ABB = A \cup B).

Step 5 — (iv) → (i). If A=ABA = A \cap B, then every element of A lies in ABA \cap B, hence in B: ABA \subset B. Cycle closed. ∎

Takeaway: four faces of one fact — in MCQs any of these can silently replace "ABA \subset B"; recognise all four instantly.


Example 29. Sets A and B satisfy: AX=BX=ϕA \cap X = B \cap X = \phi and AX=BXA \cup X = B \cup X for some set X. Show A = B.

Solution.

Step 1 — absorb A into the union. A=A(AX)A = A \cap (A \cup X) by absorption.

Step 2 — substitute the union hypothesis. AX=BXA \cup X = B \cup X, so A=A(BX)A = A \cap (B \cup X). Distribute: A=(AB)(AX)A = (A \cap B) \cup (A \cap X).

Step 3 — kill the second term. The hypothesis AX=ϕA \cap X = \phi leaves A=ABA = A \cap B, which gives ABA \subset B.

Step 4 — repeat symmetrically for B. B=B(BX)=B(AX)=(BA)(BX)=BAB = B \cap (B \cup X) = B \cap (A \cup X) = (B \cap A) \cup (B \cap X) = B \cap A, giving BAB \subset A.

Step 5 — conclude. Containment both ways: A = B. ∎

Takeaway: the same three tools — absorption, distributivity, disjointness — used twice symmetrically; proof questions from this chapter are permutations of exactly these moves.


Example 30. Find sets A, B, C such that ABA \cap B, BCB \cap C and ACA \cap C are all non-empty but ABC=ϕA \cap B \cap C = \phi.

Solution.

Step 1 — design principle. Give each PAIR its own private shared element, and give no element to all three.

Step 2 — construct. A = {1, 2}, B = {2, 3}, C = {1, 3}: pair (A, B) shares 2, pair (B, C) shares 3, pair (A, C) shares 1.

Step 3 — verify all four conditions. AB={2}ϕA \cap B = \{2\} \neq \phi ✓; BC={3}ϕB \cap C = \{3\} \neq \phi ✓; AC={1}ϕA \cap C = \{1\} \neq \phi ✓. Triple: an element of all three would have to be in each two-element set — check 1 (B\notin B), 2 (C\notin C), 3 (A\notin A): none qualifies, so ABC=ϕA \cap B \cap C = \phi ✓.

Takeaway: pairwise overlap does NOT force a common core — the triangle {1,2}, {2,3}, {1,3} is the minimal counterexample, worth memorising.

Example 31. U = {1, 2, …, 10}, A = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}, B = {4, 5, 6, 7}, C = {6, 7, 8, 9}. Compute (AB)C(A \cup B)' \cap C and (AB)(BC)(A' \cap B') \cup (B \cap C).

Solution.

Step 1 — first expression, inside out. AB={1,2,3,4,5,6,7}A \cup B = \{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7\}, so (AB)={8,9,10}(A \cup B)' = \{8, 9, 10\}. Intersect with C = {6, 7, 8, 9}: common elements 8, 9 → {8,9}\{8, 9\}.

Step 2 — second expression: spot the De Morgan pattern. ABA' \cap B' is exactly (AB)(A \cup B)' — already computed as {8, 9, 10}. No need to build A' and B' separately!

Step 3 — the remaining piece. BC={6,7}B \cap C = \{6, 7\}.

Step 4 — union. {8,9,10}{6,7}={6,7,8,9,10}\{8, 9, 10\} \cup \{6, 7\} = \{6, 7, 8, 9, 10\}.

Takeaway: recognising AB=(AB)A' \cap B' = (A \cup B)' saved two complement computations — pattern recognition is the speed skill this chapter trains.


Example 32. State true or false with reasons: (i) If ABA \subset B and BCB \subset C, then ACA \subset C. (ii) If A⊄BA \not\subset B and B⊄CB \not\subset C, then A⊄CA \not\subset C. (iii) If xAx \in A and A⊄BA \not\subset B, then xBx \in B.

Solution.

(i) Step 1 — true. Transitivity: take xAx \in A; the first inclusion puts it in B, the second in C.

(ii) Step 2 — false; build a counterexample. A = {1}, B = {2}, C = {1, 3}. Check: A⊄BA \not\subset B ✓ (1B1 \notin B); B⊄CB \not\subset C ✓ (2C2 \notin C); yet ACA \subset C ✓ (1C1 \in C). Negative subset facts do not chain.

(iii) Step 3 — false; read the quantifier. A⊄BA \not\subset B says SOME element of A escapes B — not that every element does. With A = {1, 2}, B = {1, 3}: A⊄BA \not\subset B (2 escapes), and for x=2x = 2, xBx \notin B — so the claimed conclusion xBx \in B fails.

Takeaway: a negated subset statement asserts the EXISTENCE of one escapee, nothing more — the single most misread quantifier in this chapter.