What This Set Is

Everything the chapter taught you meets here. Forty worked questions, numbered straight through, arranged so that each group leans on the one before it. The first few are one-line oxidation numbers. The last few are full back-titrations and cell EMFs.

Work them with a pen. Cover the answer, try the question, then read the working and see where your route differed from mine. A question you only read is a question you have not done.

Three habits are worth building while you work through this set.

Write the oxidation number over every atom that could change, before you do anything else. Half the mistakes in this chapter are made in the first ten seconds, by guessing which atom is the interesting one.

Check charge as well as atoms. An equation can have every atom matched and still be wrong. Add up the charge on the left, add it up on the right, and make the two agree before you call it balanced.

Say out loud which species is the oxidant. The oxidising agent is the one that is reduced. Students lose more marks to that single swap than to any calculation error in the chapter.

Questions Topic What it tests
1-5 Classical and electronic definitions Reading a reaction three ways and naming the oxidant and the reductant
6-13 Oxidation number assignment The rules in priority order, the peroxide-linkage traps and the fractional cases
14-16 Stock notation and naming Turning an oxidation number into a Roman numeral, and a name back into a formula
17-21 Types of redox reaction Combination, decomposition, displacement, disproportionation and the non-redox impostor
22-26 Oxidation number method Equalising rise and fall, then finishing with water, hydrogen ion or hydroxide
27-31 Half-reaction method Splitting, balancing each half separately, matching electrons and adding back
32-37 Titration arithmetic n-factor, equivalent mass, mole-ratio chains and a back titration
38-40 Electrode potentials Cell EMF, spontaneity and why one acid is banned from a permanganate flask

Roadmap card of the eight question groups from oxidation numbers to electrode potentials

Key Point: The three definitions must agree on every example. If the classical reading says a species is oxidised, the electron count and the oxidation number must say the same thing. Whenever they disagree, one of them has been read wrongly.

[JEE/NEET] Oxidation number assignment and balancing carry the most marks per minute in this chapter. Questions 6 to 31 are the ones to repeat until they are automatic.

Classical and Electronic Definitions

Question 1: Magnesium burning in carbon dioxide

A strip of burning magnesium keeps burning when it is lowered into a jar of carbon dioxide, leaving white powder and black specks.

2Mg(s)+CO2(g)2MgO(s)+C(s)\mathrm{2Mg(s) + CO_2(g) \rightarrow 2MgO(s) + C(s)}

Read this reaction by all three definitions and name the oxidant and the reductant.

Answer:

Classical first. Magnesium picks up oxygen, so magnesium is oxidised. Carbon dioxide loses its oxygen and comes out as black carbon, so carbon dioxide is reduced.

Electronic next. Magnesium metal ends up as Mg2+\mathrm{Mg^{2+}} in magnesium oxide, so each magnesium atom hands over 22 electrons. Those electrons go to carbon.

Oxidation number last. Magnesium goes from 00 to +2+2, a rise. Carbon goes from +4+4 in CO2\mathrm{CO_2} to 00 in free carbon, a fall of 44. Oxygen stays at 2-2 throughout.

All three readings agree. Two magnesium atoms rise by 22 each, giving 44; one carbon falls by 44. The electron count matches.

The species that is reduced is the oxidising agent, so carbon dioxide is the oxidant. The species that is oxidised is the reducing agent, so magnesium is the reductant.

Ans: Mg\mathrm{Mg} is oxidised and is the reducing agent; CO2\mathrm{CO_2} is reduced and is the oxidising agent. Watch out: Carbon dioxide is normally thought of as a fire extinguisher. Here it is the oxidant, because magnesium is hungry enough for oxygen to strip it from carbon.

Question 2: Hydrogen sulphide and chlorine

H2S(g)+Cl2(g)2HCl(g)+S(s)\mathrm{H_2S(g) + Cl_2(g) \rightarrow 2HCl(g) + S(s)}

Which reactant is oxidised? Answer once by the hydrogen rule and once by oxidation numbers.

Answer:

By the hydrogen rule: H2S\mathrm{H_2S} loses its hydrogen and comes out as sulphur, and removal of hydrogen is oxidation. Chlorine takes that hydrogen up as HCl\mathrm{HCl}, and addition of hydrogen is reduction.

By oxidation numbers: sulphur in H2S\mathrm{H_2S} is 2-2, since hydrogen is +1+1 and the molecule is neutral. Free sulphur is 00. So sulphur climbs by 22. Chlorine starts at 00 as the free element and ends at 1-1 in HCl\mathrm{HCl}, a fall of 11 per atom, or 22 for the molecule.

Rise of 22 against fall of 22. The two readings agree.

Ans: H2S\mathrm{H_2S} is oxidised and is the reductant; Cl2\mathrm{Cl_2} is reduced and is the oxidant.

Question 3: Tin(II) with iron(III)

Sn2+(aq)+2Fe3+(aq)Sn4+(aq)+2Fe2+(aq)\mathrm{Sn^{2+}(aq) + 2Fe^{3+}(aq) \rightarrow Sn^{4+}(aq) + 2Fe^{2+}(aq)}

Split this into half reactions, check the charge, and name the oxidant and the reductant.

Answer:

Tin goes from +2+2 to +4+4, so it loses electrons. That is the oxidation half:

Sn2+Sn4++2e\mathrm{Sn^{2+} \rightarrow Sn^{4+} + 2e^-}

Iron goes from +3+3 to +2+2, so it gains one electron per ion. Two ions are involved, so I write:

2Fe3++2e2Fe2+\mathrm{2Fe^{3+} + 2e^- \rightarrow 2Fe^{2+}}

Two electrons released, two electrons absorbed. Adding the halves cancels them and gives back the overall equation.

Charge check on the overall equation. Left: (+2)+2(+3)=+8(+2) + 2(+3) = +8. Right: (+4)+2(+2)=+8(+4) + 2(+2) = +8. They match.

Neither half happens by itself. A half reaction is only a bookkeeping device that lets me count electrons; the electrons never appear in the real flask on their own.

Ans: Sn2+\mathrm{Sn^{2+}} is oxidised and is the reducing agent; Fe3+\mathrm{Fe^{3+}} is reduced and is the oxidising agent.

Question 4: Naming the agents in three reactions

Name the oxidising and the reducing agent in each.

(i) 2K(s)+Cl2(g)2KCl(s)\mathrm{2K(s) + Cl_2(g) \rightarrow 2KCl(s)}

(ii) CuO(s)+H2(g)Cu(s)+H2O(g)\mathrm{CuO(s) + H_2(g) \rightarrow Cu(s) + H_2O(g)}

(iii) Fe2O3(s)+3CO(g)2Fe(l)+3CO2(g)\mathrm{Fe_2O_3(s) + 3CO(g) \rightarrow 2Fe(l) + 3CO_2(g)}

Answer:

(i) Potassium goes 0+10 \rightarrow +1, a rise, so potassium is oxidised. Chlorine goes 010 \rightarrow -1, a fall, so chlorine is reduced. Each potassium hands one electron to chlorine.

(ii) Copper goes +20+2 \rightarrow 0, a fall. Hydrogen goes 0+10 \rightarrow +1, a rise. Classical reading agrees: copper oxide loses oxygen and hydrogen gains it.

(iii) Iron goes +30+3 \rightarrow 0 over two atoms, so 66 electrons are gained in total. Carbon goes +2+2 in CO\mathrm{CO} to +4+4 in CO2\mathrm{CO_2}, losing 22 each, and there are three of them, so 66 electrons are lost. The counts match.

In every case the reduced species is the oxidant.

Ans: (i) oxidant Cl2\mathrm{Cl_2}, reductant K\mathrm{K}; (ii) oxidant CuO\mathrm{CuO}, reductant H2\mathrm{H_2}; (iii) oxidant Fe2O3\mathrm{Fe_2O_3}, reductant CO\mathrm{CO}. Watch out: In (iii) carbon monoxide is the reductant even though it contains oxygen. What matters is the change in oxidation number, not whether the formula looks reduced.

Question 5: Hydrogen peroxide, both ways round

Decide what hydrogen peroxide is doing in each reaction.

(a) H2O2+2KI+H2SO4I2+K2SO4+2H2O\mathrm{H_2O_2 + 2KI + H_2SO_4 \rightarrow I_2 + K_2SO_4 + 2H_2O}

(b) 2KMnO4+5H2O2+3H2SO42MnSO4+K2SO4+5O2+8H2O\mathrm{2KMnO_4 + 5H_2O_2 + 3H_2SO_4 \rightarrow 2MnSO_4 + K_2SO_4 + 5O_2 + 8H_2O}

Answer:

The oxygen in hydrogen peroxide is at 1-1, because it holds a peroxide linkage. That is an in-between value, so it can go either way.

(a) Iodide goes from 1-1 to 00 in I2\mathrm{I_2}, so iodide is oxidised. The oxygen of H2O2\mathrm{H_2O_2} ends up in water at 2-2, a fall from 1-1. So hydrogen peroxide is reduced here, which makes it the oxidant. Electron count: two iodides lose 11 each, two oxygens gain 11 each. Balanced.

(b) Manganese falls from +7+7 to +2+2, gaining 55 electrons per manganese, so 1010 for the two. The oxygen of H2O2\mathrm{H_2O_2} leaves as free O2\mathrm{O_2} at 00, a rise from 1-1. Each H2O2\mathrm{H_2O_2} gives up 22 electrons, and five of them give 1010. So here hydrogen peroxide is oxidised, which makes it the reductant.

Ans: In (a) H2O2\mathrm{H_2O_2} acts as the oxidising agent; in (b) it acts as the reducing agent. Watch out: Both roles are possible only because oxygen at 1-1 sits between 2-2 and 00. Read the other reactant before deciding which role peroxide has taken.

Oxidation Numbers, Traps and Fractions

Question 6: The two nitrogens of ammonium nitrate

Find the oxidation number of nitrogen in NH4NO3\mathrm{NH_4NO_3} and in NH4NO2\mathrm{NH_4NO_2}.

Answer:

If I treat all the nitrogen as one kind, I get an average. For NH4NO3\mathrm{NH_4NO_3} there are two nitrogens, four hydrogens at +1+1 and three oxygens at 2-2:

2x+4(+1)+3(2)=02x=+2x=+12x + 4(+1) + 3(-2) = 0 \quad \Rightarrow \quad 2x = +2 \quad \Rightarrow \quad x = +1

That +1+1 is only an average. The salt is really NH4+\mathrm{NH_4^+} and NO3\mathrm{NO_3^-}, so I do each ion on its own. In NH4+\mathrm{NH_4^+}: x+4(+1)=+1x + 4(+1) = +1, so x=3x = -3. In NO3\mathrm{NO_3^-}: x+3(2)=1x + 3(-2) = -1, so x=+5x = +5. The mean of 3-3 and +5+5 is +1+1, which matches.

For NH4NO2\mathrm{NH_4NO_2}: 2x+4(+1)+2(2)=02x + 4(+1) + 2(-2) = 0 gives 2x=02x = 0, so the average is 00. Splitting the ions, ammonium nitrogen is 3-3 and nitrite nitrogen is +3+3, since x+2(2)=1x + 2(-2) = -1. The mean of 3-3 and +3+3 is 00, which matches.

Ans: NH4NO3\mathrm{NH_4NO_3}: average +1+1, actual 3-3 and +5+5. NH4NO2\mathrm{NH_4NO_2}: average 00, actual 3-3 and +3+3. Watch out: An average of 00 in NH4NO2\mathrm{NH_4NO_2} does not mean nitrogen is uncombined. When a salt has the element in two different ions, always split the ions.

Question 7: Chlorine in bleaching powder

Bleaching powder is written CaOCl2\mathrm{CaOCl_2}. Find the oxidation number of chlorine in it.

Answer:

Straight arithmetic first. Calcium is +2+2, oxygen is 2-2, and there are two chlorines:

(+2)+(2)+2x=0x=0(+2) + (-2) + 2x = 0 \quad \Rightarrow \quad x = 0

An average of 00 for a chlorine that is clearly combined should make me suspicious. The real structure is Ca(OCl)Cl\mathrm{Ca(OCl)Cl}: one chlorine sits in the hypochlorite ion and the other is a plain chloride.

In OCl\mathrm{OCl^-}: x+(2)=1x + (-2) = -1, so that chlorine is +1+1. The chloride is 1-1. The mean of +1+1 and 1-1 is 00, which is the average I calculated.

Ans: average 00; actually one chlorine at +1+1 and one at 1-1. Watch out: Zero here does not mean free chlorine. It is the mean of two chlorines in genuinely different environments, which is exactly why bleaching powder both bleaches and gives chloride.

Question 8: Two sulphur oxoanions that look alike

Find the oxidation number of sulphur in the peroxodisulphate ion S2O82\mathrm{S_2O_8^{2-}} and in the dithionate ion S2O62\mathrm{S_2O_6^{2-}}.

Answer:

I start with S2O82\mathrm{S_2O_8^{2-}} the naive way, taking every oxygen at 2-2:

2x+8(2)=22x=+14x=+72x + 8(-2) = -2 \quad \Rightarrow \quad 2x = +14 \quad \Rightarrow \quad x = +7

Sulphur cannot exceed +6+6, since it has only six valence electrons to lose. That impossible answer tells me an oxygen assumption is wrong. This ion carries one peroxide linkage, OO\mathrm{-O-O-}, and those two oxygens are 1-1, not 2-2. Redoing it with six oxygens at 2-2 and two at 1-1:

2x+6(2)+2(1)=22x14=22x=+12x=+62x + 6(-2) + 2(-1) = -2 \quad \Rightarrow \quad 2x - 14 = -2 \quad \Rightarrow \quad 2x = +12 \quad \Rightarrow \quad x = +6

Now S2O62\mathrm{S_2O_6^{2-}}. Dithionate has a sulphur-sulphur bond, not a peroxide linkage, so every oxygen really is 2-2:

2x+6(2)=22x=+10x=+52x + 6(-2) = -2 \quad \Rightarrow \quad 2x = +10 \quad \Rightarrow \quad x = +5

A bond between two like atoms contributes nothing to either atom, so the SS\mathrm{S-S} bond does not disturb the count.

Ans: +6+6 in S2O82\mathrm{S_2O_8^{2-}}; +5+5 in S2O62\mathrm{S_2O_6^{2-}}. Watch out: The signal is a value above the group maximum. Getting +7+7 for sulphur is a message from the arithmetic that a peroxide linkage is present.

Question 9: Manganese in hausmannite

Find the average oxidation number of manganese in Mn3O4\mathrm{Mn_3O_4}, then give the real values.

Answer:

Average first, oxygen at 2-2:

3x+4(2)=03x=+8x=+833x + 4(-2) = 0 \quad \Rightarrow \quad 3x = +8 \quad \Rightarrow \quad x = +\frac{8}{3}

No atom can lose two-thirds of an electron, so +8/3+8/3 is a bookkeeping mean, not a real charge. The structure is MnOMn2O3\mathrm{MnO \cdot Mn_2O_3}, so one manganese is +2+2 and two are +3+3.

Checking: (+2)+2(+3)=+8(+2) + 2(+3) = +8 against 4(2)=84(-2) = -8, and the mean of +2,+3,+3+2, +3, +3 is +8/3+8/3.

Ans: average +8/3+8/3; actual states +2+2 for one manganese and +3+3 for two. Watch out: If the question says "oxidation states" in the plural, give +2+2 and +3+3. If it says "oxidation number", give +8/3+8/3.

Question 10: Nitrogen in the azides

Find the oxidation number of nitrogen in hydrazoic acid HN3\mathrm{HN_3} and in sodium azide NaN3\mathrm{NaN_3}.

Answer:

Hydrogen is +1+1, so for HN3\mathrm{HN_3}:

(+1)+3x=03x=1x=13(+1) + 3x = 0 \quad \Rightarrow \quad 3x = -1 \quad \Rightarrow \quad x = -\frac{1}{3}

Sodium is +1+1 too, so NaN3\mathrm{NaN_3} gives exactly the same equation and the same answer.

The three nitrogens in the azide ion are not identical in bonding, but there is no simple whole-number split of the kind that works for Fe3O4\mathrm{Fe_3O_4}, so 1/3-1/3 is the answer that is quoted.

Ans: 1/3-1/3 in both. Watch out: A fraction is a perfectly legal oxidation number. Rounding it to 00 or forcing it to 1-1 is the error to avoid.

Question 11: Carbon in acetic acid

Find the average oxidation number of carbon in CH3COOH\mathrm{CH_3COOH}, then assign each carbon separately.

Answer:

Average, with hydrogen at +1+1 and oxygen at 2-2:

2x+4(+1)+2(2)=02x=0x=02x + 4(+1) + 2(-2) = 0 \quad \Rightarrow \quad 2x = 0 \quad \Rightarrow \quad x = 0

Now the individual atoms. For each bond I hand both shared electrons to the more electronegative atom, and a carbon-carbon bond splits evenly and counts as nothing.

The methyl carbon is bonded to three hydrogens and one carbon. Each CH\mathrm{C-H} bond gives it 1-1 and the CC\mathrm{C-C} bond gives 00, so it is 3-3.

The carboxyl carbon is bonded to one carbon (00), to a doubly bonded oxygen (+2+2) and to the oxygen of the OH\mathrm{-OH} group (+1+1). That is +3+3.

Mean of 3-3 and +3+3 is 00, matching the average.

Ans: average 00; methyl carbon 3-3, carboxyl carbon +3+3. Watch out: An average of zero does not mean carbon is unoxidised. Organic redox questions almost always want the individual carbon, not the mean.

Question 12: Iodine in three of its own compounds

Find the oxidation number of iodine in I3\mathrm{I_3^-}, in ICl\mathrm{ICl} and in ICl3\mathrm{ICl_3}.

Answer:

For the triiodide ion, all three atoms are iodine, so:

3x=1x=133x = -1 \quad \Rightarrow \quad x = -\frac{1}{3}

Structurally the ion is an I2\mathrm{I_2} molecule holding on to an I\mathrm{I^-}, so two iodines are really 00 and one is 1-1. The mean of 0,0,10, 0, -1 is 1/3-1/3, as calculated.

For ICl\mathrm{ICl} I compare electronegativities. Chlorine is more electronegative than iodine, so chlorine takes 1-1 and iodine is +1+1.

For ICl3\mathrm{ICl_3}, three chlorines at 1-1 give 3-3, so iodine is +3+3.

Ans: 1/3-1/3 in I3\mathrm{I_3^-}; +1+1 in ICl\mathrm{ICl}; +3+3 in ICl3\mathrm{ICl_3}. Watch out: In an interhalogen the less electronegative halogen carries the positive value. Iodine is positive here even though halogens are usually pictured as 1-1.

Question 13: The three oxoacids of phosphorus

Find the oxidation number of phosphorus in H3PO2\mathrm{H_3PO_2}, H3PO3\mathrm{H_3PO_3} and H3PO4\mathrm{H_3PO_4}.

Answer:

Hydrogen +1+1, oxygen 2-2 in all three, because none of them holds a peroxide linkage.

H3PO2\mathrm{H_3PO_2}: 3(+1)+x+2(2)=03(+1) + x + 2(-2) = 0, so x+34=0x + 3 - 4 = 0 and x=+1x = +1.

H3PO3\mathrm{H_3PO_3}: 3(+1)+x+3(2)=03(+1) + x + 3(-2) = 0, so x=+3x = +3.

H3PO4\mathrm{H_3PO_4}: 3(+1)+x+4(2)=03(+1) + x + 4(-2) = 0, so x=+5x = +5.

The rise of 22 from one acid to the next is just an extra oxygen each time.

Ans: +1+1, +3+3 and +5+5. Watch out: All three have three hydrogens, but they are not all tribasic. Basicity depends on how many hydrogens sit on oxygen, which is a different question from oxidation number, so do not read one off the other.

Stock Notation and Naming

Question 14: Six formulae into Stock names

Name Hg2Cl2\mathrm{Hg_2Cl_2}, HgCl2\mathrm{HgCl_2}, MnO\mathrm{MnO}, MnO2\mathrm{MnO_2}, CrO3\mathrm{CrO_3} and Tl2O\mathrm{Tl_2O} in Stock notation.

Answer:

Stock notation puts the oxidation number of the metal as a Roman numeral in brackets after its name, so I work out that number first.

Hg2Cl2\mathrm{Hg_2Cl_2}: two chlorides give 2-2, shared over two mercuries, so each is +1+1.

HgCl2\mathrm{HgCl_2}: two chlorides on one mercury, so mercury is +2+2.

MnO\mathrm{MnO}: one oxygen at 2-2, so manganese is +2+2.

MnO2\mathrm{MnO_2}: two oxygens give 4-4, so manganese is +4+4.

CrO3\mathrm{CrO_3}: three oxygens give 6-6, so chromium is +6+6.

Tl2O\mathrm{Tl_2O}: 2x+(2)=02x + (-2) = 0, so each thallium is +1+1.

Ans: mercury(I) chloride, mercury(II) chloride, manganese(II) oxide, manganese(IV) oxide, chromium(VI) oxide, thallium(I) oxide. Watch out: The Roman numeral belongs to one atom, never to the whole formula. Calling Hg2Cl2\mathrm{Hg_2Cl_2} mercury(II) chloride adds the two mercuries together and names a completely different compound.

Question 15: Six Stock names into formulae

Write the formula for iron(III) sulphate, tin(IV) chloride, copper(I) iodide, chromium(III) oxide, nickel(II) nitrate and manganese(VII) oxide.

Answer:

I read the Roman numeral as the charge on the metal, then balance it against the anion.

Iron(III) with sulphate SO42\mathrm{SO_4^{2-}}: two irons give +6+6, three sulphates give 6-6, so Fe2(SO4)3\mathrm{Fe_2(SO_4)_3}.

Tin(IV) with chloride: four chlorides, so SnCl4\mathrm{SnCl_4}.

Copper(I) with iodide: one each, so CuI\mathrm{CuI}.

Chromium(III) with oxide O2\mathrm{O^{2-}}: two chromiums give +6+6 against three oxides at 6-6, so Cr2O3\mathrm{Cr_2O_3}.

Nickel(II) with nitrate NO3\mathrm{NO_3^-}: two nitrates, so Ni(NO3)2\mathrm{Ni(NO_3)_2}.

Manganese(VII) with oxide: two manganese give +14+14, seven oxides give 14-14, so Mn2O7\mathrm{Mn_2O_7}.

Ans: Fe2(SO4)3\mathrm{Fe_2(SO_4)_3}, SnCl4\mathrm{SnCl_4}, CuI\mathrm{CuI}, Cr2O3\mathrm{Cr_2O_3}, Ni(NO3)2\mathrm{Ni(NO_3)_2}, Mn2O7\mathrm{Mn_2O_7}. Watch out: Brackets matter when the anion has more than one atom. Dropping them turns nickel(II) nitrate into a string of subscripts that means something else entirely, and the same goes for iron(III) sulphate.

Question 16: The compound Stock notation cannot name in one word

Red lead is Pb3O4\mathrm{Pb_3O_4}. Find the oxidation number of lead, then say how the compound is named and why a single Roman numeral will not do.

Answer:

Average first:

3x+4(2)=03x=+8x=+833x + 4(-2) = 0 \quad \Rightarrow \quad 3x = +8 \quad \Rightarrow \quad x = +\frac{8}{3}

Roman numerals only come in whole numbers, so +8/3+8/3 cannot go into a Stock name at all.

The structure sorts it out. Red lead is 2PbOPbO2\mathrm{2PbO \cdot PbO_2}, so two lead atoms are +2+2 and one is +4+4. Checking the mean: (2×2+4)/3=8/3(2 \times 2 + 4)/3 = 8/3, which agrees.

Because the atoms sit in two genuinely different states, the name has to carry both: dilead(II) lead(IV) oxide.

Ans: average +8/3+8/3; two lead at +2+2 and one at +4+4; named dilead(II) lead(IV) oxide. Watch out: Stock notation only works when the element has one whole-number oxidation state in the compound. A fractional average is a signal that the formula unit contains atoms in more than one state.

Sorting Redox Reactions into Types

Question 17: Five reactions, five labels

Classify each as combination, decomposition, displacement, disproportionation or not a redox reaction at all.

(a) 2Na(s)+H2(g)2NaH(s)\mathrm{2Na(s) + H_2(g) \rightarrow 2NaH(s)}

(b) 2NaN3(s)2Na(s)+3N2(g)\mathrm{2NaN_3(s) \rightarrow 2Na(s) + 3N_2(g)}

(c) Cl2(g)+2NaBr(aq)2NaCl(aq)+Br2(l)\mathrm{Cl_2(g) + 2NaBr(aq) \rightarrow 2NaCl(aq) + Br_2(l)}

(d) 2Cu+(aq)Cu2+(aq)+Cu(s)\mathrm{2Cu^+(aq) \rightarrow Cu^{2+}(aq) + Cu(s)}

(e) BaCl2(aq)+Na2SO4(aq)BaSO4(s)+2NaCl(aq)\mathrm{BaCl_2(aq) + Na_2SO_4(aq) \rightarrow BaSO_4(s) + 2NaCl(aq)}

Answer:

(a) Two elements combine into one compound, so it is combination. It is redox because sodium goes 0+10 \rightarrow +1 and hydrogen goes 010 \rightarrow -1. Hydrogen is 1-1 here because it is bonded to a metal.

(b) One compound splits into two products, so it is decomposition. Sodium falls from +1+1 to 00 and nitrogen rises from 1/3-1/3 to 00. This is the airbag reaction.

(c) Chlorine takes bromine's place, and both are non-metals, so it is non-metal displacement. Chlorine goes 010 \rightarrow -1 and bromide goes 10-1 \rightarrow 0. It runs because chlorine is the stronger oxidant, +1.36 V+1.36\ \mathrm{V} against +1.09 V+1.09\ \mathrm{V}.

(d) One species, copper(I), gives both products. Copper goes up to +2+2 and down to 00 in the same reaction, so it is disproportionation.

(e) No oxidation number changes anywhere. Barium stays +2+2, sulphate stays intact, sodium stays +1+1, chloride stays 1-1. It is a precipitation, not a redox reaction.

Ans: (a) combination; (b) decomposition; (c) displacement; (d) disproportionation; (e) not redox. Watch out: A reaction that forms a solid and looks dramatic is not automatically redox. Check the oxidation numbers before choosing a label.

Question 18: The reaction that looks like disproportionation and is not

2KClO3(s)2KCl(s)+3O2(g)\mathrm{2KClO_3(s) \rightarrow 2KCl(s) + 3O_2(g)}

Classify this reaction, and explain why it is not disproportionation.

Answer:

Oxidation numbers first. In KClO3\mathrm{KClO_3}, potassium is +1+1 and oxygen is 2-2, so chlorine is +5+5. On the right, chlorine in KCl\mathrm{KCl} is 1-1 and the oxygen leaves as free O2\mathrm{O_2} at 00.

Chlorine falls from +5+5 to 1-1, gaining 66 electrons per atom, so 1212 for the two.

Oxygen rises from 2-2 to 00, losing 22 electrons per atom, and there are six of them, so 1212 lost. The counts match.

One compound breaks into two products, so the type is decomposition, and it is redox because oxidation numbers change.

It is not disproportionation because disproportionation needs one and the same element to be oxidised and reduced. Here chlorine is reduced and oxygen is oxidised. Two different elements, so two different roles.

Ans: Redox decomposition, with chlorine reduced and oxygen oxidised; not disproportionation. Watch out: Disproportionation is about one element, not one compound. A single reactant giving both an oxidised and a reduced product is not enough on its own.

Question 19: Nitrogen dioxide in water

2NO2(g)+H2O(l)HNO3(aq)+HNO2(aq)\mathrm{2NO_2(g) + H_2O(l) \rightarrow HNO_3(aq) + HNO_2(aq)}

Classify this and justify the label with numbers.

Answer:

Nitrogen in NO2\mathrm{NO_2}: x+2(2)=0x + 2(-2) = 0, so x=+4x = +4.

Nitrogen in HNO3\mathrm{HNO_3}: (+1)+x+3(2)=0(+1) + x + 3(-2) = 0, so x=+5x = +5.

Nitrogen in HNO2\mathrm{HNO_2}: (+1)+x+2(2)=0(+1) + x + 2(-2) = 0, so x=+3x = +3.

One nitrogen has gone up to +5+5 and the other down to +3+3, both starting from +4+4. Same element, both directions, one reaction, so it is disproportionation.

Electron count: one nitrogen loses 11, one gains 11. Balanced.

Atom check: two nitrogens on each side. Hydrogen: 22 on the left in the water, and 1+1=21 + 1 = 2 on the right. Oxygen: left 4+1=54 + 1 = 5; right 3+2=53 + 2 = 5. Everything matches.

It is possible only because +4+4 is an intermediate state for nitrogen, with +5+5 available above and +3+3 below.

Ans: Disproportionation; nitrogen goes from +4+4 to +5+5 and to +3+3.

Question 20: Running disproportionation backwards

SO2(g)+2H2S(g)3S(s)+2H2O(l)\mathrm{SO_2(g) + 2H_2S(g) \rightarrow 3S(s) + 2H_2O(l)}

What is special about the way sulphur behaves here?

Answer:

Sulphur in SO2\mathrm{SO_2} is +4+4, since each oxygen is 2-2. Sulphur in H2S\mathrm{H_2S} is 2-2, since each hydrogen is +1+1. On the right, all three sulphurs come out as the free element at 00.

So the sulphur that started high comes down, and the sulphur that started low goes up, and they meet in the middle.

Electron count: one sulphur falls from +4+4 to 00, gaining 44. Two sulphurs climb from 2-2 to 00, losing 22 each, giving 44 lost. Balanced.

Atom check: sulphur 1+2=31 + 2 = 3 on the left and 33 on the right; hydrogen 44 on each side; oxygen 22 on each side.

This is the opposite of disproportionation. Two different oxidation states of one element converge on a single intermediate state, which is called comproportionation.

Ans: The same element in two different states, +4+4 and 2-2, converges to one state, 00. It is comproportionation, the reverse of disproportionation. Watch out: SO2\mathrm{SO_2} is the oxidant here and H2S\mathrm{H_2S} is the reductant, even though both contain sulphur. The roles are decided by which direction each sulphur moves.

Question 21: Two displacements, two different kinds

Classify each and check the electron count.

(a) Cr2O3(s)+2Al(s)Al2O3(s)+2Cr(s)\mathrm{Cr_2O_3(s) + 2Al(s) \rightarrow Al_2O_3(s) + 2Cr(s)}

(b) 2Na(s)+2H2O(l)2NaOH(aq)+H2(g)\mathrm{2Na(s) + 2H_2O(l) \rightarrow 2NaOH(aq) + H_2(g)}

Answer:

(a) Aluminium goes 0+30 \rightarrow +3, losing 33 electrons each, so 66 for two atoms. Chromium goes +30+3 \rightarrow 0, gaining 33 each, so 66 gained. Balanced.

One metal has pushed another metal out of its compound, so this is metal displacement, the thermite type. It runs because aluminium is the stronger reductant: EE^\circ for Al3+/Al\mathrm{Al^{3+}/Al} is 1.66 V-1.66\ \mathrm{V} against 0.74 V-0.74\ \mathrm{V} for Cr3+/Cr\mathrm{Cr^{3+}/Cr}, so

Ecell=0.74(1.66)=+0.92 VE^\circ_{\mathrm{cell}} = -0.74 - (-1.66) = +0.92\ \mathrm{V}

which is positive, so the reaction is spontaneous as written.

(b) Sodium goes 0+10 \rightarrow +1, losing 11 each, so 22 in all. Hydrogen falls from +1+1 to 00, and two of the four hydrogens do so, gaining 11 each, so 22 gained. Balanced.

A metal has displaced hydrogen, which is a non-metal, so this is non-metal displacement.

Ans: (a) metal displacement, Ecell=+0.92 VE^\circ_{\mathrm{cell}} = +0.92\ \mathrm{V}; (b) non-metal displacement of hydrogen. Watch out: In (b) only half the hydrogen changes. The two hydrogens that end up in NaOH\mathrm{NaOH} are still +1+1; assuming all four are reduced gives a fall of 44 against a rise of 22.

Balancing by the Oxidation Number Method

The routine never changes. Find the atoms whose oxidation number moves, work out the total rise and the total fall, multiply the two species so that rise equals fall, then tidy up the remaining atoms and finish with water and either hydrogen ion or hydroxide ion.

Decision flow choosing between the oxidation number method and the half reaction method

Question 22: Dichromate with hydrogen sulphide in acid

Balance in acidic medium.

Cr2O72+H2SCr3++S\mathrm{Cr_2O_7^{2-} + H_2S \rightarrow Cr^{3+} + S}

Answer:

First I mark the changes. Chromium in Cr2O72\mathrm{Cr_2O_7^{2-}} is +6+6, since 2x+7(2)=22x + 7(-2) = -2. It ends at +3+3, so each chromium falls by 33, and there are two of them, so the fall is 66 per dichromate ion.

Sulphur in H2S\mathrm{H_2S} is 2-2 and ends at 00 as free sulphur, a rise of 22 per sulphur.

To make rise equal fall I need three sulphurs against one dichromate: 3×2=63 \times 2 = 6.

Cr2O72+3H2S2Cr3++3S\mathrm{Cr_2O_7^{2-} + 3H_2S \rightarrow 2Cr^{3+} + 3S}

Now the leftovers. Seven oxygens on the left have nowhere to go except water, so I write 7H2O7\mathrm{H_2O} on the right. That needs 1414 hydrogens on the left, and only 66 come from the three H2S\mathrm{H_2S}, so I add 8H+8\mathrm{H^+}:

Cr2O72+3H2S+8H+2Cr3++3S+7H2O\mathrm{Cr_2O_7^{2-} + 3H_2S + 8H^+ \rightarrow 2Cr^{3+} + 3S + 7H_2O}

Atom check: Cr\mathrm{Cr} 22 and 22; S\mathrm{S} 33 and 33; O\mathrm{O} 77 and 77; H\mathrm{H} 6+8=146 + 8 = 14 on the left and 1414 on the right.

Charge check: left (2)+0+(+8)=+6(-2) + 0 + (+8) = +6; right 2(+3)=+62(+3) = +6. They match.

Ans: Cr2O72+3H2S+8H+2Cr3++3S+7H2O\mathrm{Cr_2O_7^{2-} + 3H_2S + 8H^+ \rightarrow 2Cr^{3+} + 3S + 7H_2O}

Question 23: Dichromate with concentrated hydrochloric acid

Balance this molecular equation by the oxidation number method.

K2Cr2O7+HClKCl+CrCl3+Cl2+H2O\mathrm{K_2Cr_2O_7 + HCl \rightarrow KCl + CrCl_3 + Cl_2 + H_2O}

Answer:

Chromium goes from +6+6 to +3+3, gaining 33 each. Two chromiums per formula unit, so the fall is 66.

Chlorine is trickier. It starts at 1-1 in HCl\mathrm{HCl}, but only some of it changes. The chlorine in KCl\mathrm{KCl} and CrCl3\mathrm{CrCl_3} is still 1-1; only the chlorine that leaves as Cl2\mathrm{Cl_2} has risen to 00. Each of those loses 11.

To match a fall of 66 I need six chlorines oxidised, which is 3Cl23\mathrm{Cl_2}:

K2Cr2O7+HCl2KCl+2CrCl3+3Cl2+H2O\mathrm{K_2Cr_2O_7 + HCl \rightarrow 2KCl + 2CrCl_3 + 3Cl_2 + H_2O}

Now I count the chlorine on the right: 22 in KCl\mathrm{KCl}, 66 in 2CrCl32\mathrm{CrCl_3} and 66 in 3Cl23\mathrm{Cl_2}, giving 1414. So I need 14HCl14\mathrm{HCl}, which brings 1414 hydrogens and therefore 7H2O7\mathrm{H_2O}:

K2Cr2O7+14HCl2KCl+2CrCl3+3Cl2+7H2O\mathrm{K_2Cr_2O_7 + 14HCl \rightarrow 2KCl + 2CrCl_3 + 3Cl_2 + 7H_2O}

Atom check: K\mathrm{K} 22 and 22; Cr\mathrm{Cr} 22 and 22; O\mathrm{O} 77 and 77; H\mathrm{H} 1414 and 1414; Cl\mathrm{Cl} 1414 and 2+6+6=142 + 6 + 6 = 14.

Both sides are neutral molecules, so the charge balances at zero.

Ans: K2Cr2O7+14HCl2KCl+2CrCl3+3Cl2+7H2O\mathrm{K_2Cr_2O_7 + 14HCl \rightarrow 2KCl + 2CrCl_3 + 3Cl_2 + 7H_2O} Watch out: Only 66 of the 1414 chlorines are oxidised. Counting all 1414 as oxidised gives a rise of 1414 against a fall of 66 and wrecks the whole balance.

Question 24: Iodine oxidised by concentrated nitric acid

Balance in acidic medium.

I2+HNO3HIO3+NO2+H2O\mathrm{I_2 + HNO_3 \rightarrow HIO_3 + NO_2 + H_2O}

Answer:

Iodine starts as the free element at 00. In HIO3\mathrm{HIO_3} it is (+1)+x+3(2)=0(+1) + x + 3(-2) = 0, so x=+5x = +5. That is a rise of 55 per atom, and I2\mathrm{I_2} has two atoms, so the rise is 1010 per molecule.

Nitrogen in HNO3\mathrm{HNO_3} is +5+5 and in NO2\mathrm{NO_2} it is +4+4, a fall of only 11 per atom.

So I need ten nitrogens for one iodine molecule:

I2+10HNO32HIO3+10NO2+H2O\mathrm{I_2 + 10HNO_3 \rightarrow 2HIO_3 + 10NO_2 + H_2O}

Hydrogen: 1010 on the left, 22 in the two HIO3\mathrm{HIO_3}, so 88 must go into water, giving 4H2O4\mathrm{H_2O}.

I2+10HNO32HIO3+10NO2+4H2O\mathrm{I_2 + 10HNO_3 \rightarrow 2HIO_3 + 10NO_2 + 4H_2O}

Atom check: I\mathrm{I} 22 and 22; N\mathrm{N} 1010 and 1010; H\mathrm{H} 1010 and 2+8=102 + 8 = 10; O\mathrm{O} 3030 on the left and 6+20+4=306 + 20 + 4 = 30 on the right.

Everything is neutral, so charge is fine.

Ans: I2+10HNO32HIO3+10NO2+4H2O\mathrm{I_2 + 10HNO_3 \rightarrow 2HIO_3 + 10NO_2 + 4H_2O} Watch out: The rise is 1010, not 55, because I2\mathrm{I_2} carries two iodine atoms. Forgetting the subscript halves every coefficient on the right.

Question 25: Chromite oxidised by hypochlorite in alkali

Balance in basic medium.

CrO2+ClOCrO42+Cl\mathrm{CrO_2^- + ClO^- \rightarrow CrO_4^{2-} + Cl^-}

Answer:

Chromium in CrO2\mathrm{CrO_2^-}: x+2(2)=1x + 2(-2) = -1, so x=+3x = +3. In CrO42\mathrm{CrO_4^{2-}}: x+4(2)=2x + 4(-2) = -2, so x=+6x = +6. That is a rise of 33.

Chlorine in ClO\mathrm{ClO^-}: x+(2)=1x + (-2) = -1, so x=+1x = +1. It ends at 1-1 as chloride, a fall of 22.

The lowest common multiple of 33 and 22 is 66, so I take two chromiums and three chlorines:

2CrO2+3ClO2CrO42+3Cl\mathrm{2CrO_2^- + 3ClO^- \rightarrow 2CrO_4^{2-} + 3Cl^-}

Now I balance charge, because the medium is basic and hydroxide is what is available. Left: 2(1)+3(1)=52(-1) + 3(-1) = -5. Right: 2(2)+3(1)=72(-2) + 3(-1) = -7. The left needs to be more negative by 22, so I add 2OH2\mathrm{OH^-} to the left:

2CrO2+3ClO+2OH2CrO42+3Cl\mathrm{2CrO_2^- + 3ClO^- + 2OH^- \rightarrow 2CrO_4^{2-} + 3Cl^-}

That brings 22 hydrogens in, which have to leave as water, so I put 1H2O1\mathrm{H_2O} on the right:

2CrO2+3ClO+2OH2CrO42+3Cl+H2O\mathrm{2CrO_2^- + 3ClO^- + 2OH^- \rightarrow 2CrO_4^{2-} + 3Cl^- + H_2O}

Atom check: Cr\mathrm{Cr} 22 and 22; Cl\mathrm{Cl} 33 and 33; H\mathrm{H} 22 and 22; O\mathrm{O} 4+3+2=94 + 3 + 2 = 9 on the left and 8+1=98 + 1 = 9 on the right.

Charge check: left 232=7-2 - 3 - 2 = -7; right 43=7-4 - 3 = -7.

Ans: 2CrO2+3ClO+2OH2CrO42+3Cl+H2O\mathrm{2CrO_2^- + 3ClO^- + 2OH^- \rightarrow 2CrO_4^{2-} + 3Cl^- + H_2O} Watch out: No H+\mathrm{H^+} may survive in a basic answer. If you balanced as if the medium were acidic, neutralise every H+\mathrm{H^+} with OH\mathrm{OH^-} on both sides before you write the final line.

Question 26: Zinc reducing nitrate to ammonia in alkali

Balance in basic medium.

Zn+NO3ZnO22+NH3\mathrm{Zn + NO_3^- \rightarrow ZnO_2^{2-} + NH_3}

Answer:

Zinc goes from 00 to +2+2 in the zincate ion, since x+2(2)=2x + 2(-2) = -2. That is a rise of 22.

Nitrogen goes from +5+5 in nitrate to 3-3 in ammonia, a fall of 88.

Four zincs against one nitrate makes rise equal fall: 4×2=84 \times 2 = 8.

4Zn+NO34ZnO22+NH3\mathrm{4Zn + NO_3^- \rightarrow 4ZnO_2^{2-} + NH_3}

Charge next. Left is 1-1; right is 4(2)=84(-2) = -8. I need 77 more negative charges on the left, so 7OH7\mathrm{OH^-} go there:

4Zn+NO3+7OH4ZnO22+NH3\mathrm{4Zn + NO_3^- + 7OH^- \rightarrow 4ZnO_2^{2-} + NH_3}

Hydrogen: 77 on the left, 33 in ammonia, so 44 remain and go into 2H2O2\mathrm{H_2O}:

4Zn+NO3+7OH4ZnO22+NH3+2H2O\mathrm{4Zn + NO_3^- + 7OH^- \rightarrow 4ZnO_2^{2-} + NH_3 + 2H_2O}

Atom check: Zn\mathrm{Zn} 44 and 44; N\mathrm{N} 11 and 11; O\mathrm{O} 3+7=103 + 7 = 10 on the left and 8+2=108 + 2 = 10 on the right; H\mathrm{H} 77 on the left and 3+4=73 + 4 = 7 on the right.

Charge check: left 17=8-1 - 7 = -8; right 4(2)=84(-2) = -8.

Ans: 4Zn+NO3+7OH4ZnO22+NH3+2H2O\mathrm{4Zn + NO_3^- + 7OH^- \rightarrow 4ZnO_2^{2-} + NH_3 + 2H_2O} Watch out: A fall of 88 for one nitrogen is the largest single change in this chapter. Writing +5+5 to 3-3 as a fall of 22 is the standard slip, because the sign flip is easy to miss.

Balancing by the Half-Reaction Method

Question 27: Chlorate oxidising iodide in acid

Balance by the ion-electron method.

ClO3+ICl+I2\mathrm{ClO_3^- + I^- \rightarrow Cl^- + I_2}

Answer:

I split it into two skeleton halves.

Reduction half: ClO3Cl\mathrm{ClO_3^- \rightarrow Cl^-}. Chlorine is already balanced. Three oxygens on the left need 3H2O3\mathrm{H_2O} on the right, and those six hydrogens need 6H+6\mathrm{H^+} on the left. Charge is then 1+6=+5-1 + 6 = +5 on the left and 1-1 on the right, so I add 6e6\mathrm{e^-} to the left:

ClO3+6H++6eCl+3H2O\mathrm{ClO_3^- + 6H^+ + 6e^- \rightarrow Cl^- + 3H_2O}

Oxidation half: 2II2\mathrm{2I^- \rightarrow I_2}. Charge is 2-2 on the left and 00 on the right, so two electrons leave:

2II2+2e\mathrm{2I^- \rightarrow I_2 + 2e^-}

The reduction half needs 66 electrons and the oxidation half supplies 22, so I multiply the oxidation half by 33 and add:

ClO3+6I+6H+Cl+3I2+3H2O\mathrm{ClO_3^- + 6I^- + 6H^+ \rightarrow Cl^- + 3I_2 + 3H_2O}

Atom check: Cl\mathrm{Cl} 11 and 11; I\mathrm{I} 66 and 66; O\mathrm{O} 33 and 33; H\mathrm{H} 66 and 66.

Charge check: left 16+6=1-1 - 6 + 6 = -1; right 1-1.

Ans: ClO3+6I+6H+Cl+3I2+3H2O\mathrm{ClO_3^- + 6I^- + 6H^+ \rightarrow Cl^- + 3I_2 + 3H_2O}

Question 28: Hydrogen peroxide oxidising iron(II) in acid

Balance by the ion-electron method.

H2O2+Fe2+Fe3++H2O\mathrm{H_2O_2 + Fe^{2+} \rightarrow Fe^{3+} + H_2O}

Answer:

Oxidation half is short: Fe2+Fe3++e\mathrm{Fe^{2+} \rightarrow Fe^{3+} + e^-}. Charge is +2+2 on the left and +31=+2+3 - 1 = +2 on the right.

Reduction half: H2O22H2O\mathrm{H_2O_2 \rightarrow 2H_2O}. The oxygens are balanced at two each side. Hydrogen is 22 on the left and 44 on the right, so I add 2H+2\mathrm{H^+} to the left. Charge is then +2+2 on the left and 00 on the right, so 2e2\mathrm{e^-} join the left:

H2O2+2H++2e2H2O\mathrm{H_2O_2 + 2H^+ + 2e^- \rightarrow 2H_2O}

The reduction half takes 22 electrons, so the iron half is doubled and added:

H2O2+2Fe2++2H+2Fe3++2H2O\mathrm{H_2O_2 + 2Fe^{2+} + 2H^+ \rightarrow 2Fe^{3+} + 2H_2O}

Atom check: Fe\mathrm{Fe} 22 and 22; O\mathrm{O} 22 and 22; H\mathrm{H} 2+2=42 + 2 = 4 and 44.

Charge check: left 0+2(+2)+2(+1)=+60 + 2(+2) + 2(+1) = +6; right 2(+3)=+62(+3) = +6.

Here the oxygen of the peroxide falls from 1-1 to 2-2, so hydrogen peroxide is the oxidant, exactly as in Question 5(a).

Ans: H2O2+2Fe2++2H+2Fe3++2H2O\mathrm{H_2O_2 + 2Fe^{2+} + 2H^+ \rightarrow 2Fe^{3+} + 2H_2O}

Question 29: Thiosulphate and iodine

Balance the reaction behind every iodometric titration.

S2O32+I2S4O62+I\mathrm{S_2O_3^{2-} + I_2 \rightarrow S_4O_6^{2-} + I^-}

Answer:

Oxidation half: 2S2O32S4O62\mathrm{2S_2O_3^{2-} \rightarrow S_4O_6^{2-}}. I need two thiosulphate ions to make one tetrathionate, since the product has four sulphurs. Oxygen is 66 on each side, which is already right. Charge is 4-4 on the left and 2-2 on the right, so two electrons leave:

2S2O32S4O62+2e\mathrm{2S_2O_3^{2-} \rightarrow S_4O_6^{2-} + 2e^-}

Reduction half: I2+2e2I\mathrm{I_2 + 2e^- \rightarrow 2I^-}. Charge is 2-2 on each side.

Both halves involve 22 electrons, so I add them straight away:

2S2O32+I2S4O62+2I\mathrm{2S_2O_3^{2-} + I_2 \rightarrow S_4O_6^{2-} + 2I^-}

Charge check: left 4-4; right 22=4-2 - 2 = -4.

The oxidation numbers make the same point: sulphur goes from +2+2 in thiosulphate to an average of +5/2+5/2 in tetrathionate, a rise of 1/21/2 per sulphur over four sulphurs, which is a total of 22 electrons.

Ans: 2S2O32+I2S4O62+2I\mathrm{2S_2O_3^{2-} + I_2 \rightarrow S_4O_6^{2-} + 2I^-} Watch out: The mole ratio here is I2:S2O32=1:2\mathrm{I_2 : S_2O_3^{2-} = 1 : 2}, and every iodometry calculation rests on it. Reading it as 1:11:1 halves the final answer.

Question 30: Permanganate and sulphite in alkali

Balance in basic medium.

MnO4+SO32MnO2+SO42\mathrm{MnO_4^- + SO_3^{2-} \rightarrow MnO_2 + SO_4^{2-}}

Answer:

Reduction half: MnO4MnO2\mathrm{MnO_4^- \rightarrow MnO_2}. Manganese falls from +7+7 to +4+4, so three electrons are involved. In basic medium I balance oxygen by putting water on the side short of oxygen and hydroxide on the other. The left has four oxygens and the right has two, so I add 2H2O2\mathrm{H_2O} on the left and 4OH4\mathrm{OH^-} on the right. Charge is then 1-1 on the left and 4-4 on the right, so 3e3\mathrm{e^-} join the left:

MnO4+2H2O+3eMnO2+4OH\mathrm{MnO_4^- + 2H_2O + 3e^- \rightarrow MnO_2 + 4OH^-}

Oxidation half: SO32SO42\mathrm{SO_3^{2-} \rightarrow SO_4^{2-}}. Sulphur climbs from +4+4 to +6+6, so two electrons leave. The right needs one more oxygen, so 2OH2\mathrm{OH^-} go on the left and H2O\mathrm{H_2O} on the right. Charge: left 22=4-2 - 2 = -4; right 2-2, so two electrons leave the right side:

SO32+2OHSO42+H2O+2e\mathrm{SO_3^{2-} + 2OH^- \rightarrow SO_4^{2-} + H_2O + 2e^-}

To match electrons I take the reduction half twice and the oxidation half three times, giving 66 each way. Adding:

2MnO4+3SO32+4H2O+6OH2MnO2+3SO42+8OH+3H2O\mathrm{2MnO_4^- + 3SO_3^{2-} + 4H_2O + 6OH^- \rightarrow 2MnO_2 + 3SO_4^{2-} + 8OH^- + 3H_2O}

Now I cancel what appears on both sides. Three waters cancel, leaving H2O\mathrm{H_2O} on the left, and six hydroxides cancel, leaving 2OH2\mathrm{OH^-} on the right:

2MnO4+3SO32+H2O2MnO2+3SO42+2OH\mathrm{2MnO_4^- + 3SO_3^{2-} + H_2O \rightarrow 2MnO_2 + 3SO_4^{2-} + 2OH^-}

Atom check: Mn\mathrm{Mn} 22 and 22; S\mathrm{S} 33 and 33; H\mathrm{H} 22 and 22; O\mathrm{O} 8+9+1=188 + 9 + 1 = 18 on the left and 4+12+2=184 + 12 + 2 = 18 on the right.

Charge check: left 26=8-2 - 6 = -8; right 62=8-6 - 2 = -8.

Ans: 2MnO4+3SO32+H2O2MnO2+3SO42+2OH\mathrm{2MnO_4^- + 3SO_3^{2-} + H_2O \rightarrow 2MnO_2 + 3SO_4^{2-} + 2OH^-} Watch out: Permanganate stops at MnO2\mathrm{MnO_2} here, so the n-factor is 33, not 55. The medium decides the product and the product decides the electron count.

Question 31: Stannite reducing bismuth hydroxide

Balance in basic medium.

SnO22+Bi(OH)3SnO32+Bi\mathrm{SnO_2^{2-} + Bi(OH)_3 \rightarrow SnO_3^{2-} + Bi}

Answer:

Oxidation half: SnO22SnO32\mathrm{SnO_2^{2-} \rightarrow SnO_3^{2-}}. Tin rises from +2+2 to +4+4, so two electrons leave. The right needs one extra oxygen, so I add 2OH2\mathrm{OH^-} on the left and H2O\mathrm{H_2O} on the right. Charge: left 22=4-2 - 2 = -4; right 2-2, so two electrons come off the right:

SnO22+2OHSnO32+H2O+2e\mathrm{SnO_2^{2-} + 2OH^- \rightarrow SnO_3^{2-} + H_2O + 2e^-}

Reduction half: Bi(OH)3Bi\mathrm{Bi(OH)_3 \rightarrow Bi}. Bismuth falls from +3+3 to 00, so three electrons are needed, and the three hydroxide groups leave as 3OH3\mathrm{OH^-}. Charge: left 03=30 - 3 = -3; right 3-3:

Bi(OH)3+3eBi+3OH\mathrm{Bi(OH)_3 + 3e^- \rightarrow Bi + 3OH^-}

Six is the lowest common multiple of 22 and 33, so the tin half is taken three times and the bismuth half twice:

3SnO22+6OH+2Bi(OH)33SnO32+3H2O+2Bi+6OH\mathrm{3SnO_2^{2-} + 6OH^- + 2Bi(OH)_3 \rightarrow 3SnO_3^{2-} + 3H_2O + 2Bi + 6OH^-}

Six hydroxides appear on both sides and cancel:

3SnO22+2Bi(OH)33SnO32+2Bi+3H2O\mathrm{3SnO_2^{2-} + 2Bi(OH)_3 \rightarrow 3SnO_3^{2-} + 2Bi + 3H_2O}

Atom check: Sn\mathrm{Sn} 33 and 33; Bi\mathrm{Bi} 22 and 22; H\mathrm{H} 66 and 66; O\mathrm{O} 6+6=126 + 6 = 12 on the left and 9+3=129 + 3 = 12 on the right.

Charge check: left 3(2)+0=63(-2) + 0 = -6; right 3(2)=63(-2) = -6.

Ans: 3SnO22+2Bi(OH)33SnO32+2Bi+3H2O\mathrm{3SnO_2^{2-} + 2Bi(OH)_3 \rightarrow 3SnO_3^{2-} + 2Bi + 3H_2O} Watch out: Hydroxide that ends up on both sides must be cancelled. Leaving 6OH6\mathrm{OH^-} on each side is not wrong chemically, but it is an unfinished answer.

Titration Arithmetic

Summary chart of n-factors and equivalent masses for the common redox reagents

Question 32: n-factors and equivalent masses, all in one place

Give the n-factor and the equivalent mass of: KMnO4\mathrm{KMnO_4} in acidic, in neutral and in strongly alkaline medium; K2Cr2O7\mathrm{K_2Cr_2O_7} in acid; H2C2O42H2O\mathrm{H_2C_2O_4 \cdot 2H_2O}; Mohr salt; H2O2\mathrm{H_2O_2}; and I2\mathrm{I_2}.

Answer:

The n-factor is just the number of electrons one formula unit gains or loses, and the equivalent mass is the molar mass divided by it.

KMnO4\mathrm{KMnO_4} in acid: MnO4Mn2+\mathrm{MnO_4^- \rightarrow Mn^{2+}}, manganese +7+2+7 \rightarrow +2, so n=5n = 5 and E=158/5=31.6E = 158/5 = 31.6.

KMnO4\mathrm{KMnO_4} in neutral or weakly basic medium: MnO4MnO2\mathrm{MnO_4^- \rightarrow MnO_2}, +7+4+7 \rightarrow +4, so n=3n = 3 and E=158/3=52.67E = 158/3 = 52.67.

KMnO4\mathrm{KMnO_4} in strongly alkaline medium: MnO4MnO42\mathrm{MnO_4^- \rightarrow MnO_4^{2-}}, +7+6+7 \rightarrow +6, so n=1n = 1 and E=158E = 158.

K2Cr2O7\mathrm{K_2Cr_2O_7} in acid: Cr2O722Cr3+\mathrm{Cr_2O_7^{2-} \rightarrow 2Cr^{3+}}, +6+3+6 \rightarrow +3 over two chromiums, so n=6n = 6 and E=294/6=49E = 294/6 = 49.

H2C2O42H2O\mathrm{H_2C_2O_4 \cdot 2H_2O} as a reductant: C2O422CO2\mathrm{C_2O_4^{2-} \rightarrow 2CO_2}, two electrons lost, so n=2n = 2 and E=126/2=63E = 126/2 = 63.

Mohr salt: Fe2+Fe3+\mathrm{Fe^{2+} \rightarrow Fe^{3+}}, one electron, so n=1n = 1 and E=392E = 392.

H2O2\mathrm{H_2O_2}: n=2n = 2 whichever role it plays, so E=34/2=17E = 34/2 = 17.

I2\mathrm{I_2}: I2+2e2I\mathrm{I_2 + 2e^- \rightarrow 2I^-}, so n=2n = 2 and E=254/2=127E = 254/2 = 127.

Ans: n=5,3,1,6,2,1,2,2n = 5, 3, 1, 6, 2, 1, 2, 2 with equivalent masses 31.631.6, 52.6752.67, 158158, 4949, 6363, 392392, 1717 and 127127. Watch out: For oxalic acid as a reductant the n-factor is 22 because two electrons are lost, and that happens to be the same as its basicity. The two ideas are different, and for permanganate they are nothing alike.

Question 33: A straight permanganate against iron(II)

What volume of 0.02 M0.02\ \mathrm{M} KMnO4\mathrm{KMnO_4} is needed to oxidise 20.0 mL20.0\ \mathrm{mL} of 0.05 M0.05\ \mathrm{M} FeSO4\mathrm{FeSO_4} in dilute sulphuric acid?

Answer:

The balanced equation tells me the ratio.

MnO4+5Fe2++8H+Mn2++5Fe3++4H2O\mathrm{MnO_4^- + 5Fe^{2+} + 8H^+ \rightarrow Mn^{2+} + 5Fe^{3+} + 4H_2O}

One permanganate to five iron(II).

Moles of Fe2+\mathrm{Fe^{2+}}:

0.0200 L×0.05 mol L1=1.0×103 mol0.0200\ \mathrm{L} \times 0.05\ \mathrm{mol\ L^{-1}} = 1.0 \times 10^{-3}\ \mathrm{mol}

Moles of MnO4\mathrm{MnO_4^-} needed:

1.0×1035=2.0×104 mol\frac{1.0 \times 10^{-3}}{5} = 2.0 \times 10^{-4}\ \mathrm{mol}

Volume:

V=2.0×1040.02=0.0100 L=10.0 mLV = \frac{2.0 \times 10^{-4}}{0.02} = 0.0100\ \mathrm{L} = 10.0\ \mathrm{mL}

Checking the same thing with normalities: the permanganate is 0.02×5=0.1 N0.02 \times 5 = 0.1\ \mathrm{N} and the iron(II) is 0.05×1=0.05 N0.05 \times 1 = 0.05\ \mathrm{N}. Then N1V1=N2V2N_1V_1 = N_2V_2 gives 0.1×V=0.05×20.00.1 \times V = 0.05 \times 20.0, so V=10.0 mLV = 10.0\ \mathrm{mL}. The two routes agree.

Ans: 10.0 mL10.0\ \mathrm{mL}.

Question 34: Available chlorine in bleaching powder

0.400 g0.400\ \mathrm{g} of bleaching powder was treated with dilute acid and excess potassium iodide. The liberated iodine needed 40.0 mL40.0\ \mathrm{mL} of 0.100 M0.100\ \mathrm{M} sodium thiosulphate. Find the percentage of available chlorine. Take Cl=35.5\mathrm{Cl} = 35.5.

Answer:

Three reactions run in order, so I follow the chain.

CaOCl2+2HClCaCl2+H2O+Cl2\mathrm{CaOCl_2 + 2HCl \rightarrow CaCl_2 + H_2O + Cl_2}

Cl2+2KI2KCl+I2\mathrm{Cl_2 + 2KI \rightarrow 2KCl + I_2}

I2+2S2O322I+S4O62\mathrm{I_2 + 2S_2O_3^{2-} \rightarrow 2I^- + S_4O_6^{2-}}

So one mole of chlorine gives one mole of iodine, which takes two moles of thiosulphate.

Moles of thiosulphate:

0.0400 L×0.100 mol L1=4.00×103 mol0.0400\ \mathrm{L} \times 0.100\ \mathrm{mol\ L^{-1}} = 4.00 \times 10^{-3}\ \mathrm{mol}

Moles of iodine =4.00×103/2=2.00×103= 4.00 \times 10^{-3}/2 = 2.00 \times 10^{-3}, and moles of chlorine are the same, 2.00×1032.00 \times 10^{-3}.

Mass of chlorine, with Cl2=71\mathrm{Cl_2} = 71:

2.00×103×71=0.142 g2.00 \times 10^{-3} \times 71 = 0.142\ \mathrm{g}

Percentage:

0.1420.400×100=35.5%\frac{0.142}{0.400} \times 100 = 35.5\%

Ans: 35.5%35.5\% available chlorine. Watch out: Available chlorine is quoted as Cl2\mathrm{Cl_2}, not as chlorine atoms. Using 35.535.5 instead of 7171 halves the answer to 17.75%17.75\%.

Question 35: Weighing out Mohr salt

What mass of Mohr salt is needed to make 250 mL250\ \mathrm{mL} of a 0.1 N0.1\ \mathrm{N} solution for titration against permanganate?

Answer:

Mohr salt supplies Fe2+\mathrm{Fe^{2+}}, which loses one electron, so n=1n = 1.

When the n-factor is 11, normality and molarity are the same number, so the solution is 0.1 M0.1\ \mathrm{M}.

Moles needed:

0.250 L×0.1 mol L1=0.025 mol0.250\ \mathrm{L} \times 0.1\ \mathrm{mol\ L^{-1}} = 0.025\ \mathrm{mol}

Mass, using a molar mass of 392392:

0.025×392=9.80 g0.025 \times 392 = 9.80\ \mathrm{g}

The same result comes out of the equivalent route: the equivalent mass is 392/1=392392/1 = 392, and 0.0250.025 equivalents weigh 9.80 g9.80\ \mathrm{g}.

Ans: 9.80 g9.80\ \mathrm{g}. Watch out: The mass is that of the whole double salt, water of crystallisation included. Using 152152 for FeSO4\mathrm{FeSO_4} instead of 392392 gives 3.80 g3.80\ \mathrm{g}, which is far too little iron.

Question 36: Permanganate strength found through iodine

25.0 mL25.0\ \mathrm{mL} of an acidified KMnO4\mathrm{KMnO_4} solution was treated with excess potassium iodide. The iodine set free required 20.0 mL20.0\ \mathrm{mL} of 0.1 M0.1\ \mathrm{M} sodium thiosulphate. Find the molarity of the permanganate.

Answer:

Two equations carry the chain.

2MnO4+10I+16H+2Mn2++5I2+8H2O\mathrm{2MnO_4^- + 10I^- + 16H^+ \rightarrow 2Mn^{2+} + 5I_2 + 8H_2O}

I2+2S2O322I+S4O62\mathrm{I_2 + 2S_2O_3^{2-} \rightarrow 2I^- + S_4O_6^{2-}}

Moles of thiosulphate:

0.0200 L×0.1 mol L1=2.0×103 mol0.0200\ \mathrm{L} \times 0.1\ \mathrm{mol\ L^{-1}} = 2.0 \times 10^{-3}\ \mathrm{mol}

Moles of iodine =2.0×103/2=1.0×103= 2.0 \times 10^{-3}/2 = 1.0 \times 10^{-3}.

The first equation gives MnO4:I2=2:5\mathrm{MnO_4^- : I_2 = 2 : 5}, so

n(MnO4)=1.0×103×25=4.0×104 moln(\mathrm{MnO_4^-}) = 1.0 \times 10^{-3} \times \frac{2}{5} = 4.0 \times 10^{-4}\ \mathrm{mol}

Molarity:

4.0×1040.0250=0.016 M\frac{4.0 \times 10^{-4}}{0.0250} = 0.016\ \mathrm{M}

The electron count confirms it. The thiosulphate carried 2.0×1032.0 \times 10^{-3} electrons, each permanganate takes 55, and 2.0×103/5=4.0×104 mol2.0 \times 10^{-3}/5 = 4.0 \times 10^{-4}\ \mathrm{mol}.

Ans: 0.016 M0.016\ \mathrm{M}. Watch out: The iodine is only a carrier. Trying to compare permanganate with thiosulphate directly, as if the ratio were 1:11:1, throws the factor of 55 away.

Question 37: A back titration for hydrogen peroxide

50.0 mL50.0\ \mathrm{mL} of 0.02 M0.02\ \mathrm{M} KMnO4\mathrm{KMnO_4} was acidified and added to 25.0 mL25.0\ \mathrm{mL} of a hydrogen peroxide solution. The permanganate left over needed 20.0 mL20.0\ \mathrm{mL} of 0.05 M0.05\ \mathrm{M} oxalic acid. Find the molarity of the hydrogen peroxide and its strength in grams per litre.

Answer:

In a back titration I count electrons, because two different reductants have used up one oxidant.

Permanganate added:

0.0500×0.02=1.0×103 mol0.0500 \times 0.02 = 1.0 \times 10^{-3}\ \mathrm{mol}

Each permanganate takes 55 electrons in acid, so the total oxidising capacity is

5×1.0×103=5.0×103 equivalents5 \times 1.0 \times 10^{-3} = 5.0 \times 10^{-3}\ \mathrm{equivalents}

Oxalic acid used on the leftover permanganate:

0.0200×0.05=1.0×103 mol0.0200 \times 0.05 = 1.0 \times 10^{-3}\ \mathrm{mol}

Its n-factor is 22, so it supplied 2.0×1032.0 \times 10^{-3} equivalents. That is how much of the permanganate was left over.

Equivalents used by the hydrogen peroxide:

5.0×1032.0×103=3.0×1035.0 \times 10^{-3} - 2.0 \times 10^{-3} = 3.0 \times 10^{-3}

Hydrogen peroxide acting as a reductant has n=2n = 2, so

n(H2O2)=3.0×1032=1.5×103 moln(\mathrm{H_2O_2}) = \frac{3.0 \times 10^{-3}}{2} = 1.5 \times 10^{-3}\ \mathrm{mol}

Molarity:

1.5×1030.0250=0.06 M\frac{1.5 \times 10^{-3}}{0.0250} = 0.06\ \mathrm{M}

Strength, with H2O2=34\mathrm{H_2O_2} = 34:

0.06×34=2.04 g L10.06 \times 34 = 2.04\ \mathrm{g\ L^{-1}}

Ans: 0.06 M0.06\ \mathrm{M}, that is 0.12 N0.12\ \mathrm{N}, or 2.04 g L12.04\ \mathrm{g\ L^{-1}}. Watch out: The oxalic acid measures what was left, not what reacted with the peroxide. Subtract before you divide, and never subtract moles of two species with different n-factors: convert to equivalents first.

Electrode Potentials and Spontaneity

Question 38: A cell built from nickel and silver

Using E(Ag+/Ag)=+0.80 VE^\circ(\mathrm{Ag^+/Ag}) = +0.80\ \mathrm{V} and E(Ni2+/Ni)=0.25 VE^\circ(\mathrm{Ni^{2+}/Ni}) = -0.25\ \mathrm{V}, write the cell notation, the electrode reactions and the EMF of the cell built from these two half cells.

Answer:

The half cell with the more positive reduction potential is the one where reduction actually happens, so silver is the cathode and nickel is the anode.

Anode, where oxidation happens:

Ni(s)Ni2+(aq)+2e\mathrm{Ni(s) \rightarrow Ni^{2+}(aq) + 2e^-}

Cathode, where reduction happens, doubled so that the electrons match:

2Ag+(aq)+2e2Ag(s)\mathrm{2Ag^+(aq) + 2e^- \rightarrow 2Ag(s)}

Overall:

Ni(s)+2Ag+(aq)Ni2+(aq)+2Ag(s)\mathrm{Ni(s) + 2Ag^+(aq) \rightarrow Ni^{2+}(aq) + 2Ag(s)}

Charge check: left 2(+1)=+22(+1) = +2; right +2+2.

Cell notation puts the anode on the left:

Ni(s)Ni2+(aq)Ag+(aq)Ag(s)\mathrm{Ni(s) \mid Ni^{2+}(aq) \parallel Ag^+(aq) \mid Ag(s)}

EMF, with both values as reduction potentials:

Ecell=EcathodeEanode=0.80(0.25)=+1.05 VE^\circ_{\mathrm{cell}} = E^\circ_{\mathrm{cathode}} - E^\circ_{\mathrm{anode}} = 0.80 - (-0.25) = +1.05\ \mathrm{V}

Positive, so the reaction goes as written.

Ans: Ni(s)Ni2+(aq)Ag+(aq)Ag(s)\mathrm{Ni(s) \mid Ni^{2+}(aq) \parallel Ag^+(aq) \mid Ag(s)}, with Ecell=+1.05 VE^\circ_{\mathrm{cell}} = +1.05\ \mathrm{V}. Watch out: The silver half reaction was doubled, but its EE^\circ stays +0.80 V+0.80\ \mathrm{V}. Electrode potential is intensive, so multiplying a half reaction never multiplies its potential.

Question 39: Four predictions from one table

Decide whether each reaction is spontaneous under standard conditions.

(a) 2Ag(s)+Cu2+(aq)2Ag+(aq)+Cu(s)\mathrm{2Ag(s) + Cu^{2+}(aq) \rightarrow 2Ag^+(aq) + Cu(s)}

(b) Sn2+(aq)+2Fe3+(aq)Sn4+(aq)+2Fe2+(aq)\mathrm{Sn^{2+}(aq) + 2Fe^{3+}(aq) \rightarrow Sn^{4+}(aq) + 2Fe^{2+}(aq)}

(c) Br2(l)+2Cl(aq)2Br(aq)+Cl2(g)\mathrm{Br_2(l) + 2Cl^-(aq) \rightarrow 2Br^-(aq) + Cl_2(g)}

(d) Zn(s)+2H+(aq)Zn2+(aq)+H2(g)\mathrm{Zn(s) + 2H^+(aq) \rightarrow Zn^{2+}(aq) + H_2(g)}

Answer:

For each one I find which species is reduced, call that half cell the cathode, and subtract the potential of the half cell that is oxidised.

(a) Copper(II) is reduced, silver is oxidised.

Ecell=0.340.80=0.46 VE^\circ_{\mathrm{cell}} = 0.34 - 0.80 = -0.46\ \mathrm{V}

Negative, so it does not happen. Silver sits below copper in the activity series and cannot displace it.

(b) Iron(III) is reduced to iron(II), tin(II) is oxidised to tin(IV).

Ecell=0.770.15=+0.62 VE^\circ_{\mathrm{cell}} = 0.77 - 0.15 = +0.62\ \mathrm{V}

Positive, so it happens. This is the reaction of Question 3.

(c) Bromine would have to be reduced and chloride oxidised.

Ecell=1.091.36=0.27 VE^\circ_{\mathrm{cell}} = 1.09 - 1.36 = -0.27\ \mathrm{V}

Negative, so it does not happen. Chlorine displaces bromine, not the other way round.

(d) Hydrogen ion is reduced, zinc is oxidised.

Ecell=0.00(0.76)=+0.76 VE^\circ_{\mathrm{cell}} = 0.00 - (-0.76) = +0.76\ \mathrm{V}

Positive, so zinc dissolves in acid and gives off hydrogen.

Ans: (a) no, 0.46 V-0.46\ \mathrm{V}; (b) yes, +0.62 V+0.62\ \mathrm{V}; (c) no, 0.27 V-0.27\ \mathrm{V}; (d) yes, +0.76 V+0.76\ \mathrm{V}. Watch out: Both potentials must be reduction potentials before you subtract. Flipping the sign of the anode value and then subtracting counts the flip twice.

Question 40: Why hydrochloric acid is banned from a permanganate flask

Using E(MnO4/Mn2+)=+1.51 VE^\circ(\mathrm{MnO_4^-/Mn^{2+}}) = +1.51\ \mathrm{V}, E(Cr2O72/Cr3+)=+1.33 VE^\circ(\mathrm{Cr_2O_7^{2-}/Cr^{3+}}) = +1.33\ \mathrm{V}, E(Cl2/Cl)=+1.36 VE^\circ(\mathrm{Cl_2/Cl^-}) = +1.36\ \mathrm{V} and E(Fe3+/Fe2+)=+0.77 VE^\circ(\mathrm{Fe^{3+}/Fe^{2+}}) = +0.77\ \mathrm{V}, explain why a permanganate titration must be acidified with dilute sulphuric acid, while a dichromate titration tolerates hydrochloric acid.

Answer:

First the reaction the titration is supposed to measure. Permanganate oxidising iron(II):

Ecell=1.510.77=+0.74 VE^\circ_{\mathrm{cell}} = 1.51 - 0.77 = +0.74\ \mathrm{V}

Comfortably positive, so it runs to completion. Good.

Now the side reaction. Permanganate oxidising chloride to chlorine:

Ecell=1.511.36=+0.15 VE^\circ_{\mathrm{cell}} = 1.51 - 1.36 = +0.15\ \mathrm{V}

Still positive. So if hydrochloric acid is in the flask, permanganate attacks the chloride as well as the iron(II). Extra permanganate is used, the burette reading is too high, and the result is reported too high.

Dichromate against the same chloride:

Ecell=1.331.36=0.03 VE^\circ_{\mathrm{cell}} = 1.33 - 1.36 = -0.03\ \mathrm{V}

Negative, so chloride is not oxidised and hydrochloric acid does no harm in a dichromate titration.

Sulphuric acid is safe with both, because sulphate is already at the top of sulphur's range and cannot be oxidised further. Nitric acid is barred for the opposite reason: it is itself an oxidant and would attack the reductant in the flask.

Ans: Permanganate oxidises chloride (+0.15 V+0.15\ \mathrm{V}, spontaneous), so hydrochloric acid inflates the reading; dichromate does not (0.03 V-0.03\ \mathrm{V}), so it tolerates hydrochloric acid. Dilute sulphuric acid is safe for both. Watch out: A margin as small as +0.15 V+0.15\ \mathrm{V} is still positive, and positive means it happens. Size tells you how far the reaction goes, and sign tells you whether it goes at all.